Law School Discussion

LSAT Insider's PM

LizPendens™

  • ****
  • 4467
  • The Real Alice -- Adventures in Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2006, 03:41:52 PM »
This makes me so happy.

-cal

me too.

 - Liz

Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2006, 03:58:12 PM »
I hope they don't throw away one of my credited responses.

Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2006, 04:05:14 PM »
I hope they don't throw away one of my credited responses.

It won't be credited if they throw it out.

We'll see about that.

Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2006, 04:17:18 PM »
Nice. You did call this test lsat insider. Finally you're silencing the doubters.

Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2006, 04:20:09 PM »
can you guys vouch for this guy?

orangie

  • ****
  • 2920
  • GULC '10
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2006, 04:20:42 PM »
can you guys vouch for this guy?

yes, he's been right every single time he said anything, so he must have an uncle at LSAC! ;)

Vick

  • ****
  • 1255
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2006, 04:21:27 PM »
can you guys vouch for this guy?

Well, do YOU have an uncle working for LSAC?

OK then.

Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2006, 04:49:41 PM »
wait-- if this is for real, i am filled with glee right now.

Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2006, 05:07:30 PM »
so what does that mean for a 160? -24ish?

Re: LSAT Insider's PM
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2006, 05:27:20 PM »
so what does that mean for a 160? -24ish?

-16. Oddly enough, they're skipping over a handful of 16x scores this time around. Go figure.
-16 for a 160?!! :o