[/quote]
I will be brief. (YOU ARE a funny one, if only not unaware of what the word BRIEF means, lol)
Here's the problem. Essentially, your predictions are non-falsifiable, as are those of any troll. That's why we're not responding to you (this will be my last exception). Other people bother with facts, and what is. That doesn't mean they will be right- after all, no one knows the future. But it means that they are basing on something other than want to happen.
If Clinton is elected, you will just say, "Oh, there must have been a cover up!
(No cover up, here the FBI criminal investigation is real)
In the meantime, enjoy your popcorn. Whether you are right
(I have been right all along-no fbi criminal investigation and hillary would already be the nominee-the fact is that she is not the runaway nominee. Why? You ask? FBI, get it)
[/quote]
Here lol, read this-----
"The F.B.I.’s case did begin as a security referral from the inspectors general of the State Department and the nation’s intelligence agencies, who were concerned that classified information might have been stored outside a secure government network. But multiple law enforcement officials said the matter quickly became an investigation into whether anyone had committed a crime in handling classified information."
-a periodical
Now what have you been yammering on about, mr. Naive troll?
806 Replies
178754 Views