Now I was all on homegirl's side to get over on the Wachowski's but there are certain elements of her interview that are a bit suspect. She claims she NEVER saw the Terminator?? Is she serious? But, for the sake of argument, let's say she never saw the Terminator, fine. But then she goes on to say "they can't punish me for not having seen the Terminator movie."
oooooooooooo-k? Nobody said you were gonna get punished, ma. Where is this coming from?
Granted, if somebody stole my script I'd be on the defensive to a certain degree b/c that's a pretty HUGE accusation to make and people want to know your credentials, know that you're for real, etc. But she just seems TOO on the defensive in this interview.
Obviously I take issue with the following quote for reasons we can all understand:
"I currently work as a paralegal so I know about the law."

Just makes the shoulders cringe to hear a statement like that.
I wanna tell her Sister, relax, we're on your side, but you gotta stop making these other off the wall statements. Its not helping the overall case. Without having read the Third Eye (maybe something I can do this summer when I get some free time) it sounds like she has a valid copyright complaint on the merits. Can't wait to see how this thing plays out in trial.