Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sunsfan

Pages: [1] 2
1
Law School Admissions / Re: Held at Harvard: What does this mean?
« on: January 17, 2006, 09:29:16 PM »
Do you guys think that schools will look at the Feb score if you retake?  One the H website it says they won't look at the Feb score "under normal circumstances" or something like that.

2
Law School Admissions / When are seat deposits due?
« on: January 16, 2006, 10:07:44 PM »
After you get the acceptance letter, how long do you have until you have to pay a deposit to confirm your attendance?

In particular I'm wondering about CLS, but I'm curious about any of the T-14.

Thanks!

3
Studying for the LSAT / Re: This is an amazing test.
« on: December 24, 2005, 12:02:42 AM »
Hey PeasantRock, Ellie26, et. al.

I'm in the same boat as you guys, and completely understand your disappointment.  Like SeaDream said, a couple oversights can make the difference between a good score and a huge disappointment.

I'm probably going to retake, and I'm hoping that you guys all rock it the second time.  Prep hard, don't get discouraged, and do your best!

Congrats SeaDream on your great performance.

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: This is an amazing test.
« on: December 23, 2005, 04:41:30 PM »
I was surprised, too.  I'm leaning toward re-taking it because I don't think I can do worse the second time.  Anyone else feel the same way?

5
Studying for the LSAT / Re: post your score here
« on: December 23, 2005, 01:59:55 PM »
172.

Will probably re-take and apply next year.

Congrats on all who did well (esp. Leoris, SeaDream)!

6
Studying for the LSAT / #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« on: December 11, 2005, 04:56:28 PM »
I remember a question about babbling infants and language, and some of the answer choices were:
-something about motor skills necessary to make languages sounds
-thinking conceptually

Was the babbling infants Q the same one as #13 on the master list?

The reason I ask is that I am positive that it appeared in my experimental section (#3).

7
Studying for the LSAT / REM Sleep
« on: December 07, 2005, 01:42:01 AM »
Anyone want to discuss this more thoroughly?

I was debating between C and E.  C was something like "the people who did not get enough REM stress were more irritable", E was something like "many people who lack REM sleep are also more stressed".

I chose C because I thought E didn't demonstrate that lack of REM sleep was the cause of more stress. 

Did most people choose E?

8
Studying for the LSAT / CDs, vinyl grooves question
« on: December 07, 2005, 01:06:33 AM »
I think the consensus is that they limit artistic freedom.  However, I vaguely remember another choice along the lines of "technological limitations influence placement of tracks"

Does anyone remember this?

9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: A missing LR Question? - Dinosaur Extinction
« on: December 06, 2005, 11:26:01 AM »
After reading everything, I think holle012 is right - it was experimental.

Sorry for the false alarm... but thanks for all the responses.

Hope you all have a great score coming!

10
Studying for the LSAT / Re: A missing LR Question? - Dinosaur Extinction
« on: December 05, 2005, 10:28:32 PM »
I thought it was the 5th section in my exam.  Maybe I just got it mixed up with the 3rd... (I did have experimental LR).
Sorry if I made a mistake.

Pages: [1] 2