Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Mnemeson

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
« on: December 22, 2006, 07:17:52 AM »
I thought it was a dog as I was doing it, and was right - -9, on what is normally my second section (LR is best, LG worst).

Studying for the LSAT / Re: The SCORE THREAD
« on: December 21, 2006, 06:41:21 PM »
San Diego's median LSAT is 161, 3.34 so you should be competitive... 163/3.54 75%, 158/3.1 25%

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Post your score breakdown
« on: December 21, 2006, 06:33:03 PM »
LR -4
LR -4
LG -5 (shoulda guessed Cs....)
RC -9 (dogging dog that dog)


Studying for the LSAT / Re: The SCORE THREAD
« on: December 21, 2006, 06:31:18 PM »
162.  Improvement (just) from 160 before.  -4 on games, but bombed the RC, -9.  I knew going through it that african writers and tv imperialism was a dog (for me at least), but at least my improvement on LG and LR compensated.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Dying Bronchitis Girl with a Hacking Cough
« on: December 15, 2006, 10:07:32 AM »
The proctor in London missed the 5 minute warning for one section, as well.. I kept on thinking 'either she's late, or my watch is really bad', and finally she apologised, but there were 3 minutes left.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: SCORES ARE UP!!!!!!!!!!
« on: December 03, 2006, 05:55:37 PM »
Wow, you're lucky with 120 - I got a 90!  There was a note on my file about how Samantha's coming to my office dressed in plaid clown overalls.  I don't think she's happy...

Studying for the LSAT / Re: What did you guys write abotu for the essay?
« on: December 03, 2006, 05:31:13 PM »
I argued Get Certified too - arts affected next to nobody, and they were already known for turning down humanities requests so it wouldn't affect their stature, either - GC, they could help hundreds, and gain influence if/when it expanded into their field.

Yeah - I had an LR section 1 experimental, but I have absolutely no idea what any of the qs were.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: December GAMES POST MORTEM
« on: December 03, 2006, 12:21:32 PM »
F had to go somewhere between G and H.  So G.x.F...H was fine, H...F...y...G was fine.  What wasn't fine was anything involving F...G...H, or G...H...F.  It had to go before one, and exactly one of them, so in between the two.  Included in this is that it could not go first (one of the qs was which letter cannot go first - this was F, because that would mean going before both G and H)

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LSAT CLEARLY BIASED!!!
« on: December 03, 2006, 09:14:37 AM »
I think I've heard the word 'plaid' before, but I've never had any idea what it meant; had to work it out from the way it was being used in the game setup (that said, my worse cultural issue was probably in the writing sample, where the first half was in American spelling, and then the second I slipped back into English).

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5