Law School Discussion

Off-Topic Area => Politics and Law-Related News => Topic started by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 12, 2007, 10:12:02 AM

Title: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 12, 2007, 10:12:02 AM
...where did this come from?

...Whitewater


The Whitewater controversy was a series of events and actions that had its origins in 1978. While in Arkansas, the Clintons were partners with Jim and Susan McDougal in a real estate venture known as the Whitewater Development Corporation. According to reports, the Clintons lost their financial investment in the Whitewater business projects. At the time the McDougals operated a savings and loan that retained Hillary Clinton's legal services at Rose Law Firm. When the McDougals' savings and loan failed in 1994, federal investigators subpoenaed Clinton's legal billing records for auditing purposes. Hillary Clinton claimed to be unable to produce these records. After an extensive, two-year search, the records were found in the first lady's book room in the White House and delivered to investigators in 1996. The delayed appearance of the billing records sparked intense interest and another investigation about how they surfaced and where they had been; Clinton attributed the problem to disorganization that resulted from her move from the Arkansas Governor's Mansion to the White House as well as the effects of a White House renovation.[34] After the discovery of the records, on January 26, 1996, Clinton made history by becoming the first First Lady to testify before a grand jury.[35]

The Whitewater investigation was initiated by Independent Counsel Robert Fiske appointed by Attorney General Janet Reno. The case was later taken over by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, and concluded by Independent Counsel Robert Ray. Several other allegations were also investigated under the Whitewater umbrella. The investigations, which took place during Bill Clinton's presidency and cost an estimated $40 million, resulted in the McDougals being jailed and Webster Hubbell pleading guilty to felony charges of lying to federal investigators about Clinton's role in both Whitewater and the savings and loan failure. No criminal charges were brought against the Clintons  themselves, as Robert Ray's final report on September 20, 2000 stated that there was insufficient evidence that either of them had engaged in criminal wrongdoing.[36]



...looks like clinton really pulled an o.j. simpsonesque draw with fate...she could have landed in jail like her friends...


...if people are upset about bush "wire-tapping maneuvers"...what do they think about another four years of "questionable maneuvers" and flirting with illegal matters that will accompany rodham clinton...

haven't people had enough of the "secret sharer" politicians.


ps. Hillary clinton is a sophomore senator...obama is a freshman senator...and obama doesn't have "secret or clandestine" inclinations in his past...they have about the same senate experience...but one has a clean record and hillary's is covered in flip-flops...white water...sandy berger and no umbrella.


lets give OBAMA a chance to do something really new...a real change...not rehashed clinton bullshite.



Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 12, 2007, 10:56:19 AM
...time for a change!


...obama...
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: Julie Fern on July 12, 2007, 11:05:32 AM
julie amazed you even willing show "face" here any more, you stinking reactionary loser.

funny how now you decide it time back someone other than loser gump and "warrior class."  ha ha ha. 

and julie absolutely love how clintons drive you wingnuts crazy.  hillary worth keep around for that alone.
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 12, 2007, 04:53:40 PM
hey dumbnuts...

you miss point...obama would not be a LIAR in chief...hillary already a big fat liar and she is only a sophomore senator...

don't you think obama would be a change for the better?

you just don't like obama. :o


are you an obama hater?
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: Julie Fern on July 12, 2007, 05:42:43 PM
julie like obama very much, putz.  it you julie think smell like room full elephants.
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 12, 2007, 09:39:48 PM
julie like obama very much, putz.  it you julie think smell like room full elephants.


good...then push for obama...on that we can agree....no?
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 13, 2007, 03:15:28 AM
obama.
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: Julie Fern on July 13, 2007, 04:53:00 AM
julie like obama very much, putz. it you julie think smell like room full elephants.


good...then push for obama...on that we can agree....no?

julie not say she endorsing obama, but julie certainly support him if he nominee.

thinking of blowing some democrats now, eh?
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: The Poster on July 13, 2007, 01:09:56 PM
you guys agree now?

::watches pigs fly::
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: Julie Fern on July 13, 2007, 03:30:02 PM
he not mean it.  bluecoward sucking thompson's johnson now.
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: The Poster on July 13, 2007, 03:33:20 PM
he not mean it. bluecoward sucking thompson's johnson now.

Zod 2008.
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: Julie Fern on July 13, 2007, 04:05:08 PM
more like wad 2007.
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 13, 2007, 09:30:00 PM
julie like obama very much, putz. it you julie think smell like room full elephants.


good...then push for obama...on that we can agree....no?

julie not say she endorsing obama, but julie certainly support him if he nominee.

thinking of blowing some democrats now, eh?

since you mentioned it...how's your wife?  still bending over for her? :D :D :D

and you'll endorse obama if he is the nominee??? me too!!! or richardson or biden...edwards is a rich phony...

didn't you know...aye have the unique opportunity to vote in a primary...and guess how aye am registered?

...being independent and all...

...muhuuuuuuhaaaaaaahaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa...

if we push obama...you better vote for him in the national election...

ya can't say aye don't take care of sheep like you...baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa!
aye know how you have a fettish for goats. ;)


to bad you are one of those dill-weed democrats who only votes for other democrats...you probably think dinkins cleaned up new york... :D
 :D :D
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ě on July 14, 2007, 03:24:07 AM
zzz
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 14, 2007, 08:40:58 PM
aye knew aye didn't like clinton...but edwards has a scheming...conniving persona, as well...hey, that's just as bad...
obama wouldn't stand for that petty crap!


AP: Clinton & Edwards overheard talking about excluding some rivals from debates


 There's yet more evidence now that politicians of all political persuasions sometimes forget that microphones are likely going to be turned "on" when they're around. The Associated Press writes that after yesterday's Democratic candidates forum at the NAACP convention ended:

Fox News microphones picked up (Sen. Hillary Rodham) Clinton and (former senator John) Edwards discussing their desire to limit future joint appearances to exclude some rivals lower in the crowded field. "We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group," Edwards said.

Clinton agreed. "We've got to cut the number. ... They're not serious," she said, then thanked (Sen. Barack) Obama and Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich as they walked by. Turning back to Edwards, she added that she thought their campaigns had already tried to limit the debates and "we've gotta get back to it."Kucinich, one of the candidates that Clinton and Edwards may have been discussing, isn't taking kindly to such talk: "Imperial candidates are as repugnant to the American people and to our democracy as an imperial president," he says.

Our friends at ABC News' Political Radar say they're pressing the Clinton and Edwards campaigns to find out more about what the candidates said. ABC also has video and audio of the Clinton-Edwards conversation. The moment when Kucinich walks by comes about 31 seconds into it.

President Bush, you'll recall, has also been a little too candid around live mics in the past -- including last summer when he let slip the "s-word."

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/07/ap-clinton-edwa.html

Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on July 14, 2007, 10:18:36 PM
does anybody have info to share regarding her lies...

vent here!
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ě on July 15, 2007, 05:28:26 AM
zzz
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: The Poster on July 15, 2007, 03:29:24 PM
catching flies?
Title: Re: Rodham Clinton and her LIES...worse than bush?
Post by: ě on July 15, 2007, 04:13:16 PM
I wish.