Pre-Law Discussion

not logged in | Please Login or Register | last 200 prelaw or students topics

Home Help Login Register

+  LSD Pre-Law
|-+  Applying to law school
| |-+  Law School Applications
| | |-+  LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 Print
Author Topic: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)  (Read 14791 times)
spud1987
Guest


Email
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #120 on: November 03, 2006, 09:21:45 PM »

Just as an update to this thread...  I was accepted at UT (3.9, 162/170 out of state).  This is a school that says they consider all scores and didn't necessarily say they're taking the higher score.  I don't know if my 166 average would have gotten me accepted this early in the cycle.  I tend to think they looked at my 170 more seriously than my 162. 
Logged
itllworkout
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #121 on: November 10, 2006, 12:13:31 PM »

I just called NYU and they told me they still average.
I also contacted Columbia, who gave me an extremely vague answer:

"While we have historically averaged multiple LSAT scores, the ABA now
requires that we report the highest.  In evaluating applications for
admission, the Admissions Committee will continue to consider the
applicant’s entire testing history."

I think this means that they are not simply considering the higher score...  Huh
Logged
paigeroo
Guest


Email
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #122 on: November 16, 2006, 12:52:19 PM »

Just as an update to this thread...  I was accepted at UT (3.9, 162/170 out of state).  This is a school that says they consider all scores and didn't necessarily say they're taking the higher score.  I don't know if my 166 average would have gotten me accepted this early in the cycle.  I tend to think they looked at my 170 more seriously than my 162. 

Congrats on your acceptance SteveO!  I see your thread is still goin strong.  Awesome.  Really is helpful.
Logged
monserrat
Sr. Citizen
****
Posts: 1901


mis preciosos


View Profile
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #123 on: November 16, 2006, 05:02:52 PM »

I was at the LA law forum this weekend and spoke to Fordham who said they would take the highest score in my case.  I also spoke to Duke who said that in my case they would most likely look at just the highest score.  My score difference is 7pts.  This changed my mind about applying to Duke.   So for both schools, it seems if you have a high enough point difference, they will be looking at the highest more.  Also I was not going to write an LSAT addendum b/c I have one for my gpa but every school I spoke to said that if you do not write an LSAT addendum they will be a lot less inclined to take your highest score, they need a reason.
I also spoke to Stanford and they did not straight out say average, they said they look at each file and then decide.  Hope this helps.
Logged

Michigan 2010
Senator
Sr. Citizen
****
Posts: 202


View Profile
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #124 on: November 22, 2006, 05:03:58 PM »

I was at the LA law forum this weekend and spoke to Fordham who said they would take the highest score in my case.  I also spoke to Duke who said that in my case they would most likely look at just the highest score.  My score difference is 7pts.  This changed my mind about applying to Duke.   So for both schools, it seems if you have a high enough point difference, they will be looking at the highest more.  Also I was not going to write an LSAT addendum b/c I have one for my gpa but every school I spoke to said that if you do not write an LSAT addendum they will be a lot less inclined to take your highest score, they need a reason.
I also spoke to Stanford and they did not straight out say average, they said they look at each file and then decide.  Hope this helps.

Thanks for the good news about Duke and Stanford to a degree.
Logged

Bouzie1982
Guest


Email
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #125 on: November 26, 2006, 11:00:14 PM »

bump

GREAT thread
Logged
StudentUVA
Sr. Citizen
****
Posts: 2879


View Profile
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #126 on: December 22, 2006, 10:49:12 PM »

bump for all the dec retakers.
Logged
zephyr
Sr. Citizen
****
Posts: 635



View Profile
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #127 on: December 23, 2006, 10:33:26 AM »

I would say I'm proof that they're taking my higher score, hands down.
Logged

Jim McAllister: Larry, we're not electing the f-ing Pope here. Just tell me who won. -Election
kristen823
Sr. Citizen
****
Posts: 187


View Profile WWW
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #128 on: December 23, 2006, 11:12:34 AM »

I talked to Maryland on the phone before I retook and they said they'll take the highest. They didn't specify a point range.
Logged

So if you really love me, say yes(In): Maryland, Temple, Fordham, GW
But if you don't, dear, confess(Out):
And please don't tell me Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps(Def/WL): Gtown (PWL)


http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=kmk823
thetrianglekid
Full Member
***
Posts: 67


View Profile
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #129 on: December 24, 2006, 04:23:55 AM »

hmmm, anyone know the official policy on cancellations from the t14s?  do they somehow factor that into the average?  if that's even possible.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 Print last 200 topics: prelaw students
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.386 seconds with 17 queries.