That person applied to G-tow ed, he must have been smoking something.
Quote from: Billt568 on December 26, 2007, 12:07:44 PMFeel the sadness...taste it... feel better for yourselfhttp://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=gamecock08http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=tpw1908http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=billt568How can you get a 3.74 in college and only score a 138 on the LSAT? That is really strange.
Feel the sadness...taste it... feel better for yourselfhttp://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=gamecock08http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=tpw1908http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=billt568
How can you have a 2.75 and be ranked 98 of 601?
"School Type: law" lmao
Quote from: yodawgsup on December 26, 2007, 12:23:23 PM"School Type: law" lmaoI didn't even see that. LOL!I'm sorry, but that account HAS to be flame. There's no way it's real.
Quote from: contrarian on December 26, 2007, 11:08:13 AMQuote from: The Truth on December 26, 2007, 10:55:35 AMI would like to see thatIf you weren't applying as a URM for preferential treatment at upper tier schools then you would.That seems uncalled for. But, a classic case – http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=donbarzini
Quote from: The Truth on December 26, 2007, 10:55:35 AMI would like to see thatIf you weren't applying as a URM for preferential treatment at upper tier schools then you would.
I would like to see that
What exactly was Barzini's PS about? Can anybody who read it tell me? Also, were there other contributing factors to his being shut out across the board?
38 Replies
3305 Views