Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools  (Read 7358 times)

Avicenna

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
    • View Profile
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #50 on: January 13, 2008, 11:34:59 PM »
It's not about defending my law school. W&L is not my law school. I'm only considering the school. The problem I have remiz22, is when someone(ie. botbot) goes on a W&L ASW Open forum thread(a thread detailing the campus visit open forum day) and rips on the program. It confuses people who are seriously considering the school.I agree with you, and your point is valid. I was just hoping there would be a degree of maturity on this blog that every prospective law student could honor. Obviously, I was wrong.

Avicenna

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
    • View Profile

Avicenna

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
    • View Profile
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #52 on: January 13, 2008, 11:47:33 PM »
in what way may I ask?

The Mark

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 40
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #53 on: January 13, 2008, 11:53:58 PM »
Anyone know what Big Law $ is for Tampa area?

Not sure how current it is, but infirmation puts first years in Tampa at anywhere from 95K-125K.

Word. Thanks. That's actually better than what I would have thought.

remiz22

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 206
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #54 on: January 13, 2008, 11:58:43 PM »
It's not about defending my law school. W&L is not my law school. I'm only considering the school. The problem I have remiz22, is when someone(ie. botbot) goes on a W&L ASW Open forum thread(a thread detailing the campus visit open forum day) and rips on the program. It confuses people who are seriously considering the school.I agree with you, and your point is valid. I was just hoping there would be a degree of maturity on this blog that every prospective law student could honor. Obviously, I was wrong.

I understand and respect your POV. But in my opinion, people who are smart enough to be in a position to attend W&L law school can marshal arguments presented on this board. Botbot's angle is clear and any poster who would use his (or anyone else’s) criticism as a decision making device is foolish.

I personally believe that posters advancing a certain law school must accept the possibility that other posters will offer a different (often critical) perspective on that school.

Avicenna

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
    • View Profile
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #55 on: January 14, 2008, 12:03:07 AM »
I agree, this is an opinionated defense. Nonetheless, a bit immature.

botbot

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2840
    • View Profile
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #56 on: January 14, 2008, 11:01:50 AM »
Woah.  The other thread being overly anti-W&L is one thing, but to come in here and call me an anti-W&L troll based on this thread is absurd.

Will you please show me some numbers that suggest mine are way off?

boilerguy84

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 78
  • "I've got something to say..."
    • View Profile
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #57 on: January 14, 2008, 07:51:11 PM »
I would like to know about the cutoff at Cooley

all cooley grads are highly sought after.
"read a book."
Depaul '11

4RE

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Re: ITT you discuss biglaw cutoffs at some mid-T1 schools
« Reply #58 on: January 16, 2008, 12:11:17 PM »
tag