I'm in Section 2. I've got Donahue, Warren, Meltzer and Leubsdorf (visiting from Rutgers). I've looked at the evals but if anyone has any insider info, I'd love it!
I'm in section 4! I've got Barkow, Steiker, Frug and Greiner. Any inside would be appreciated. Also, where do we find the evals that were mentioned above?
I also just got my assignment and I'm in section I with these profs:Minow-Civ. ProFerrell-ContractsMack-PropertySargentich-TortsBressman (visiting)-LegislationKahan (visiting)-CriminalAnyone have any info to share on them? It would be greatly appreciated!
Section 6.
Saw dashrashi's LSN site. Since she seems to use profanity, one could say that HYP does not necessarily mean class or refinement.
Thanks for being the bearer of good news Dash. I'll be sure to be extra nice to Hanson.Quote from: dashrashi on August 12, 2008, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: indyguy7484 on August 11, 2008, 09:48:38 PMGot my section assignment through the mail today. I'll be in section 6. Anyone else going to be with me?V. cool. Weinreb (eee!) for Crim, and Hanson (double eee!) for Torts. Issacharoff, visiting prof from NYU for CivPro, Berger (Am Indian law prof from UConn) for Prop, and Triantis for Ks. I think I've heard good things about the latter. Weinreb advice: try to keep current on the reading, because there will be periods of time where he will suddenly wallop you with a hundred pp in a night. Also, our final was closed-book, but he didn't care about case names. Study accordingly if he has the same MO for this year. It was really hard, but I think the curve was generous. Also, he's frakkin awesome. Hanson advice: be nice to him. Or you'll have me to answer to. (Also, I did all the reading. I don't know whether or not that's necessary, but I found it helpful, although some really are just unintelligible 'til after class. But he's not Socratic, and there are relatively few cases. It's a really mellow experience, I thought. Oh, you're so lucky. Oh, oh, oh. So jealous.)
Quote from: indyguy7484 on August 11, 2008, 09:48:38 PMGot my section assignment through the mail today. I'll be in section 6. Anyone else going to be with me?V. cool. Weinreb (eee!) for Crim, and Hanson (double eee!) for Torts. Issacharoff, visiting prof from NYU for CivPro, Berger (Am Indian law prof from UConn) for Prop, and Triantis for Ks. I think I've heard good things about the latter. Weinreb advice: try to keep current on the reading, because there will be periods of time where he will suddenly wallop you with a hundred pp in a night. Also, our final was closed-book, but he didn't care about case names. Study accordingly if he has the same MO for this year. It was really hard, but I think the curve was generous. Also, he's frakkin awesome. Hanson advice: be nice to him. Or you'll have me to answer to. (Also, I did all the reading. I don't know whether or not that's necessary, but I found it helpful, although some really are just unintelligible 'til after class. But he's not Socratic, and there are relatively few cases. It's a really mellow experience, I thought. Oh, you're so lucky. Oh, oh, oh. So jealous.)
Got my section assignment through the mail today. I'll be in section 6. Anyone else going to be with me?