Law School Discussion

"incontestable evidence"

"incontestable evidence"
« on: October 27, 2007, 02:20:57 PM »
nvm...kind of a dumb question. thanks marko.

Marko

  • ****
  • 167
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: "incontestable evidence"
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2007, 02:34:22 PM »
well it's apparently incontestible. it doesn't mean it's not "contestable" but at first glance it seems like it is. I would say it refers to "Obviously, one can alter their handwriting to include this." It cant be the first sentence. The second one is just an example of the first sentence. Obviously is the key word. And i would agree that it's apparently incontestible that we can alter our handwriting.