Quote from: cui bono? on October 12, 2007, 09:35:08 AMQuote from: final_id on October 12, 2007, 12:11:56 AMNice. Four previous juvie raps. Emmit Till he ain't ...yeah I really wasn't feeling the comparison...or the t-shirts made up that reflected the comparison. Wow! I missed all that. I wish it weren't so, but I'm not surprised, I suppose. ::smh:: From the LIttle Rock Nine to the Jena 6 -- we need to do better, black people!
Quote from: final_id on October 12, 2007, 12:11:56 AMNice. Four previous juvie raps. Emmit Till he ain't ...yeah I really wasn't feeling the comparison...or the t-shirts made up that reflected the comparison.
Nice. Four previous juvie raps. Emmit Till he ain't ...
You are better than most, P.
Quote from: Miss P on October 09, 2007, 09:32:10 AMThe controversy was about two things (1) whether the officer clearly identified himself as NYPD when he approached (and touched) the car with his gun out and (2) whether Bell was trying to hurt him or was instead just trying to get away. Either way, the police have a policy of not firing into moving vehicles. Even if you believe the police identified themselves clearly and that Bell was trying to hurt them, these facts are insufficient to overcome the clear judgments underlying the policy. It was very dangerous, and we are lucky that no one else was killed or seriously hurt.While I appreciate your time and you have added to my knowledge of NYPD procedures, what you're describing isn't racism.
The controversy was about two things (1) whether the officer clearly identified himself as NYPD when he approached (and touched) the car with his gun out and (2) whether Bell was trying to hurt him or was instead just trying to get away. Either way, the police have a policy of not firing into moving vehicles. Even if you believe the police identified themselves clearly and that Bell was trying to hurt them, these facts are insufficient to overcome the clear judgments underlying the policy. It was very dangerous, and we are lucky that no one else was killed or seriously hurt.
That's cool how you referenced a case.
I'm so far from the end of my tether right now that I reckon I could knit myself some socks with the slack.
Quote from: naturallybeyoutiful on October 12, 2007, 05:54:32 PMQuote from: cui bono? on October 12, 2007, 09:35:08 AMQuote from: final_id on October 12, 2007, 12:11:56 AMNice. Four previous juvie raps. Emmit Till he ain't ...yeah I really wasn't feeling the comparison...or the t-shirts made up that reflected the comparison. Wow! I missed all that. I wish it weren't so, but I'm not surprised, I suppose. ::smh:: From the LIttle Rock Nine to the Jena 6 -- we need to do better, black people!Yeah I was too through once I saw the t-shirts. WTF
Quote from: final_id on October 12, 2007, 06:42:49 PMSorry. I must hazard a rephrase: "we must do better, PEOPLE." It's not just blacks who get fooled into thinking a victim of one racial bias must be himself unblemished. I appreciate your thoughts, though I stand by what I said. I think we both can agree that my statement is just as true as yours. Nonetheless, I am chiefly concerned in this instance not with the responses of "people" in general wrt Jena 6, but with particular black people's misguidedly shallow parallels that reveal a lack of understanding of what it looks like when justice is truly thwarted. jsia
Sorry. I must hazard a rephrase: "we must do better, PEOPLE." It's not just blacks who get fooled into thinking a victim of one racial bias must be himself unblemished.
IMO, justice has been thwarted in this case regardless of Mychal Bell's wrongdoing. I don't see why he has to be innocent in order to receive fair treatment.
Quote from: Miss P on October 13, 2007, 10:20:58 PMIMO, justice has been thwarted in this case regardless of Mychal Bell's wrongdoing. I don't see why he has to be innocent in order to receive fair treatment.I hear you, Miss P, and do agree. But I just think some are too quick to forget that just because someone is treated unfairly doesn't make him innocent. We don't need conflate these two notions by making Ernie Greens and Emmett Tills out of Mychal Bells. That's all I'm saying...
Quote from: cui bono? on October 13, 2007, 08:32:23 AMQuote from: naturallybeyoutiful on October 12, 2007, 05:54:32 PMQuote from: cui bono? on October 12, 2007, 09:35:08 AMQuote from: final_id on October 12, 2007, 12:11:56 AMNice. Four previous juvie raps. Emmit Till he ain't ...yeah I really wasn't feeling the comparison...or the t-shirts made up that reflected the comparison. Wow! I missed all that. I wish it weren't so, but I'm not surprised, I suppose. ::smh:: From the LIttle Rock Nine to the Jena 6 -- we need to do better, black people!Yeah I was too through once I saw the t-shirts. WTF I've had an eye on the Jena Six for a good part of the last six months, and I've never seen a t-shirt comparing the boys to Emmett Till. What does it say?
There's a shot of the scene now (lovely stump) in this PDF document, scroll on down:http://www.t4sj.org/clientimages/39669/revealingracistroots2.pdf... but it's not directly linked so I can't just img-code it, and I can't find another one on the web.But the question is: did something catch fire there?
I didn't see the whole t-shirt and I'm not sure if it caught on. But in one of the news clips there were a few black teenagers with a black shirt with white lettering. I think there was a picture in the middle of the shirt of Emmett Till. The white lettering on the bottom said something to the effect that what's happening to Bell is like a 2007 version of Till. said something about 50+ years later...BellCan some pls 'splain the comparision? There's really no similarities that I can see other than they were both black young men.
False comparison is:Till is wrongly accused and punishedJena six are punishedtherefore (assumption!) Jena six must be wrongly accused.Kind of like an LSAT question ...