Law School Discussion

Michael Moore v. CNN

7S

  • ****
  • 1702
  • Self-determination.
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #80 on: July 14, 2007, 05:26:48 AM »
I read this in the comments section on a youtube clip where Faux News was propagandizing the merits of Sicko. I thought it was hilarious.

"And ONE OTHER THING HANNITY FORGOT TO MENTION ABOUT THE HORRORS OF NATIONAL HEALTH CARE (*SOCIALIZED* MEDICINE):

EVEN IN THOSE COUNTRIES WITH NATIONAL HEALTH CARE PEOPLE STILL EVENTUALLY *DIE*!!

HANNITY FORGOT TO POINT OUT -- AS WELL AS, OF COURSE, MOORE -- THAT UNIVERSAL NATIONAL HEALTH CARE DOES *NOT* PREVENT PEOPLE FROM EVENTUALLY *DYING*!!

SO *WHO* NEEDS NATIONAL HEALTH CARE!?"

 :D :D :D :D :D

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyM0-Q-j41c&NR=1

Julie Fern

  • *****
  • 25797
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #81 on: July 14, 2007, 06:47:41 AM »
ha ha, julie laugh.

«ě»

  • ****
  • 4497
  • non sequitur
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #82 on: July 14, 2007, 10:59:39 AM »
What an egregious display of asshattery, I hope he chokes on his own fatty neck.

MOMMY MAKE THE BAD MAN GO AWAY!

Why would anyone be against holding BigMedia accountable ?
You are confusink me.

n/a

  • ****
  • 1826
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #83 on: July 14, 2007, 12:40:35 PM »
The BS propaganda he spews; the logical fallacies he commits; he's just too much.

He is a joke.  He has long since shot any shred of credibility he has, and then has the audacity to start whining when someone doesn't suck his proverbial penis when he attempts to hog the limelight by making TV appearance after TV appearance, and thus is forced to resort to ad hominem.

7S

  • ****
  • 1702
  • Self-determination.
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #84 on: July 14, 2007, 03:26:52 PM »
The BS propaganda he spews; the logical fallacies he commits; he's just too much.

He is a joke.  He has long since shot any shred of credibility he has, and then has the audacity to start whining when someone doesn't suck his proverbial penis when he attempts to hog the limelight by making TV appearance after TV appearance, and thus is forced to resort to ad hominem.

example?

n/a

  • ****
  • 1826
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #85 on: July 14, 2007, 06:24:21 PM »
The BS propaganda he spews; the logical fallacies he commits; he's just too much.

He is a joke.  He has long since shot any shred of credibility he has, and then has the audacity to start whining when someone doesn't suck his proverbial penis when he attempts to hog the limelight by making TV appearance after TV appearance, and thus is forced to resort to ad hominem.

example?

Did you READ his letter?  I don't feel like going through and picking them out and explaining them, because lets face it Im lazy and don't care enough to do it.  I'm sure if I sat down with this letter, his numerous TV appearances, and his mockumentaries I could put together literally hundreds of falsities and fallacies.

7S

  • ****
  • 1702
  • Self-determination.
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #86 on: July 14, 2007, 06:28:30 PM »
The BS propaganda he spews; the logical fallacies he commits; he's just too much.

He is a joke.  He has long since shot any shred of credibility he has, and then has the audacity to start whining when someone doesn't suck his proverbial penis when he attempts to hog the limelight by making TV appearance after TV appearance, and thus is forced to resort to ad hominem.

example?

Did you READ his letter?  I don't feel like going through and picking them out and explaining them, because lets face it Im lazy and don't care enough to do it.  I'm sure if I sat down with this letter, his numerous TV appearances, and his mockumentaries I could put together literally hundreds of falsities and fallacies.

Yeah, I did. I don't see what you are referring to.

Captain

  • ****
  • 3316
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #87 on: July 14, 2007, 08:58:52 PM »
Tag... if I feel like it, I'll come back and repeat what I've said before about why our system is pretty good... Not perfect, but closer to it than Socialism.

7S

  • ****
  • 1702
  • Self-determination.
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #88 on: July 14, 2007, 09:09:36 PM »
Tag... if I feel like it, I'll come back and repeat what I've said before about why our system is pretty good... Not perfect, but closer to it than Socialism.

will be waiting to hear this.

Captain

  • ****
  • 3316
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Michael Moore v. CNN
« Reply #89 on: July 14, 2007, 09:50:21 PM »
First installment:

"According to Statistics Canada, approximately 1.2 million Canadians lack a family doctor and are looking for one. Others seek more urgent care. Toronto was shaken recently when the media reported that a retired hockey legend was forced to wait more than a month for life-saving chemotherapy because of a bed shortage at the largest cancer hospital in the country. American companies now routinely advertise in major Canadian dailies, offering timely health care—in the United States. No wonder that, a few years back, more than 80 percent of Canadians rated the system 'in crisis.'"