Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?  (Read 3632 times)

NYU2011

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 197
    • View Profile
What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« on: July 10, 2007, 10:47:20 PM »
I haven't seen that much talk on these schools.  Basically with my 174 and 3.43 GPA I've got a good shot at a T10 school and almost a lock at some T14 schools but I'm considering dropping applying to a few in the 20-30 range trying to get a large scholarship.

If I would do this and a school like UIUC, BC, or Notre Dame offers a full ride or close to it would I be stupid to take it?

I'd prefer to go BigLaw but I will be paying for law school pretty much 100% through scholarships and loans and already am going to graduate undergrad with 20-25K in debt (all of undergrad will be paid through scholarhsips/loans)

and another question, will a 174/3.43 be good enough to get a full ride at a T30 school?

flyaway

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2352
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2007, 10:55:04 PM »
You might want to look at my LSN profile.  I have a 177/3.41.  The largest scholarships I got anywhere (not that I applied to all top 30 schools, obviously) were $20,000 a year.  Of course, that's not to say you don't have a shot at talking them up a bit if you demonstrate real interest.

I kinda think someone like you or me, whose GPAs are still below the medians of top 30 schools has less of a chance at a full ride than someone with a 166 and a stronger GPA.
Michigan Law Class of 2010

Lindbergh

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4358
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2007, 12:24:58 AM »
I haven't seen that much talk on these schools.  Basically with my 174 and 3.43 GPA I've got a good shot at a T10 school and almost a lock at some T14 schools but I'm considering dropping applying to a few in the 20-30 range trying to get a large scholarship.

If I would do this and a school like UIUC, BC, or Notre Dame offers a full ride or close to it would I be stupid to take it?

I'd prefer to go BigLaw but I will be paying for law school pretty much 100% through scholarships and loans and already am going to graduate undergrad with 20-25K in debt (all of undergrad will be paid through scholarhsips/loans)

and another question, will a 174/3.43 be good enough to get a full ride at a T30 school?


I'd go T14 myself, but you're going to go down the scale for a full-ride, just make sure it's in a market you like, and make sure you work your ass off. 

Pop Up Video

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 7275
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2007, 12:37:54 AM »
WUSTL will probably dump a truckload of money on your doorstep.

I'd probably go T14 as well, but if you want scholarship money from T30 schools it will be a good idea to show a lot of interest in the school. Judging from LSN, it seems like ND YPs a lot for high #s people. Showing a realistic interest in the school might prevent that. Note that this also goes for T14 schools, some more than others.

seacotton

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 167
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #4 on: July 11, 2007, 04:19:16 PM »
3.4/169
Washington and Lee =2/3 (I think)
Wake Forest = full

sladkaya

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
  • Not born in Texas, but got here as soon as I could
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2007, 10:24:02 PM »
Research schools very well on LSN to make sure they give out a lot of full rides.  WUSTL, for example, only has 1-3 full rides total, and you have to apply for them separately.  They do have many half and 2/3 tuition scholarships though.

GW gave out free rides like candy this year, plus 1 year of housing on top of that.  I'd def. apply there if I were you. UIUC as well. I was very interested in the subject last cycle, hope it works out well for you!

One piece of advice - don't accept initial scholarship as the school's best offer.  If you are really interested in the school, tell them how much you like them and how a bigger scholarship will seal the deal for you.  If you're a highly competitive candidate who's genuine, polite, and persistent, it will work out for you.  I had to go through 3 rounds of scholarship re-negotiations with UT, but it was well worth it in the end. 
Accepted: Michigan($$), Northwestern($$$), Vanderbilt($$$), UCLA($$), UT($$$), WUSTL($$$), UIUC($$$$), Notre Dame($$),

Attending: TEXAS !!!

http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=sladkaya

Vapid Unicorn

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 384
  • Who, me?
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #6 on: July 11, 2007, 10:51:13 PM »
This may be unconventional advice, but I say stick with the T14.  With your numbers, you've got a shot at some money at the bottom of the T14, but probably not a full-ride at schools like GW, BC, and Notre Dame.  With an interest in BigLaw, I think the difference in elite firm placement is worth the $30,000 extra you spend.  I'd hate to see you end up with 100K in debt (UG + LS) and a median GPA at a school like Emory (not knocking Emory, it just came to mind).   
Just another 2L.

Dr. Miles

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 220
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2007, 11:39:42 PM »
while the full ride seems like a lot of money/a good deal, it's really not. you have to compare the money saved in tuition (let's say $100K) vs. the present value of the increase in lifetime earning capacity that you get from going to a top law school. the chances of getting a 'biglaw' gig going to a top 30 school are not that great; you probably need to be in the top 1/4 to top 1/3. however, if you go to a top 5 or 10 school, you will almost certainly get a job at a large law firm. so, right off the bat you'll be making at least 60K more coming from a top 5-10 school than you would coming from a top 30 school, provided you're one of the 70% or so of people at the lesser school who don't get biglaw offers. throw in the freedom to take your jd anywhere you want, and it's pretty much a no-brainer.

Lindbergh

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4358
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #8 on: July 13, 2007, 12:52:29 AM »
while the full ride seems like a lot of money/a good deal, it's really not. you have to compare the money saved in tuition (let's say $100K) vs. the present value of the increase in lifetime earning capacity that you get from going to a top law school. the chances of getting a 'biglaw' gig going to a top 30 school are not that great; you probably need to be in the top 1/4 to top 1/3. however, if you go to a top 5 or 10 school, you will almost certainly get a job at a large law firm. so, right off the bat you'll be making at least 60K more coming from a top 5-10 school than you would coming from a top 30 school, provided you're one of the 70% or so of people at the lesser school who don't get biglaw offers. throw in the freedom to take your jd anywhere you want, and it's pretty much a no-brainer.


You're also talking about the opportunity cost of 3 years not working or advancing in another career. 

I'd only take the full-ride at a lower-ranked program if you're willing to stay in that area and don't care how much you make.

Dr. Miles

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 220
    • View Profile
Re: What about non T14 but still T30 law schools?
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2007, 10:27:53 AM »
while the full ride seems like a lot of money/a good deal, it's really not. you have to compare the money saved in tuition (let's say $100K) vs. the present value of the increase in lifetime earning capacity that you get from going to a top law school. the chances of getting a 'biglaw' gig going to a top 30 school are not that great; you probably need to be in the top 1/4 to top 1/3. however, if you go to a top 5 or 10 school, you will almost certainly get a job at a large law firm. so, right off the bat you'll be making at least 60K more coming from a top 5-10 school than you would coming from a top 30 school, provided you're one of the 70% or so of people at the lesser school who don't get biglaw offers. throw in the freedom to take your jd anywhere you want, and it's pretty much a no-brainer.


You're also talking about the opportunity cost of 3 years not working or advancing in another career. 

I'd only take the full-ride at a lower-ranked program if you're willing to stay in that area and don't care how much you make.

at the risk of being pedantic, the opportunity cost you mention obviously should not be taken into account in deciding among different schools, provided you have already made the decision to go to law school.