The problem isn't having the relationship. The problem is still attending that same school and moving in the same circles when the relationship ends (even if it ends on "good terms").
The noobs are so into themsleves you'd think they allready have offers at Tool, Tool, feminine hygiene product & Dumbass LLC
Quote from: 2Lacoste on July 05, 2007, 10:50:04 AMThe problem isn't having the relationship. The problem is still attending that same school and moving in the same circles when the relationship ends (even if it ends on "good terms").I tend to agree. I'm not saying don't do it, but it can become "sticky" when things end, especially since the black communities at most schools are really small and incestuous anyway.
Quote from: Galt on July 05, 2007, 10:44:22 AMQuote from: 2Lacoste on July 05, 2007, 10:41:50 AMQuote from: cui bono? on July 05, 2007, 10:09:09 AMLMAO. this question keeps on being asked every cycle is seems (if u did a search like 10 things will pop up). The attitude of PLS II is dating as a release. I say, date in ur second semester if u must. 1L, 1st semester hell no. I have a strong no dating policy in my particular ls. Neighboring schools... fine. Long distance...fine. But have to veto the whole dating in your particular school. Break up, then that's one person that u may think u have to avoid. Unnecessary potential drama. Not a good look. Anything that causes u drama in ls needs to be dropped. Dating in your school is a bad look. Dating in your university is slightly better if it's large. I did the dating within the university jump-off second semester; again, not a good look. But dating long distance or someone who ain't at the school is fine.I humbly disagree. I do too. I don't see why two adults can't have a romantic relationship just cause they go to school together. Just be grown about it and it's fine.
Quote from: 2Lacoste on July 05, 2007, 10:41:50 AMQuote from: cui bono? on July 05, 2007, 10:09:09 AMLMAO. this question keeps on being asked every cycle is seems (if u did a search like 10 things will pop up). The attitude of PLS II is dating as a release. I say, date in ur second semester if u must. 1L, 1st semester hell no. I have a strong no dating policy in my particular ls. Neighboring schools... fine. Long distance...fine. But have to veto the whole dating in your particular school. Break up, then that's one person that u may think u have to avoid. Unnecessary potential drama. Not a good look. Anything that causes u drama in ls needs to be dropped. Dating in your school is a bad look. Dating in your university is slightly better if it's large. I did the dating within the university jump-off second semester; again, not a good look. But dating long distance or someone who ain't at the school is fine.I humbly disagree.
Quote from: cui bono? on July 05, 2007, 10:09:09 AMLMAO. this question keeps on being asked every cycle is seems (if u did a search like 10 things will pop up). The attitude of PLS II is dating as a release. I say, date in ur second semester if u must. 1L, 1st semester hell no. I have a strong no dating policy in my particular ls. Neighboring schools... fine. Long distance...fine. But have to veto the whole dating in your particular school. Break up, then that's one person that u may think u have to avoid. Unnecessary potential drama. Not a good look. Anything that causes u drama in ls needs to be dropped. Dating in your school is a bad look. Dating in your university is slightly better if it's large. I did the dating within the university jump-off second semester; again, not a good look. But dating long distance or someone who ain't at the school is fine.
LMAO. this question keeps on being asked every cycle is seems (if u did a search like 10 things will pop up). The attitude of PLS II is dating as a release. I say, date in ur second semester if u must. 1L, 1st semester hell no. I have a strong no dating policy in my particular ls. Neighboring schools... fine. Long distance...fine. But have to veto the whole dating in your particular school. Break up, then that's one person that u may think u have to avoid. Unnecessary potential drama. Not a good look. Anything that causes u drama in ls needs to be dropped.
Quote from: Massa' on July 05, 2007, 10:47:43 AMQuote from: Galt on July 05, 2007, 10:44:22 AMQuote from: 2Lacoste on July 05, 2007, 10:41:50 AMQuote from: cui bono? on July 05, 2007, 10:09:09 AMLMAO. this question keeps on being asked every cycle is seems (if u did a search like 10 things will pop up). The attitude of PLS II is dating as a release. I say, date in ur second semester if u must. 1L, 1st semester hell no. I have a strong no dating policy in my particular ls. Neighboring schools... fine. Long distance...fine. But have to veto the whole dating in your particular school. Break up, then that's one person that u may think u have to avoid. Unnecessary potential drama. Not a good look. Anything that causes u drama in ls needs to be dropped. Dating in your school is a bad look. Dating in your university is slightly better if it's large. I did the dating within the university jump-off second semester; again, not a good look. But dating long distance or someone who ain't at the school is fine.I humbly disagree. I do too. I don't see why two adults can't have a romantic relationship just cause they go to school together. Just be grown about it and it's fine. Just because folks go to LS does not mean they're grown. LS is kinda like high school all over again- only this time we're on our own and drive our own cars. Still wit the lockers and still with petty drama. "ooooh I saw so and so studying with such and such in the library but then he was studing with someone else on friday" gettheheckoutta here! Never thought anyone in LS could be needy. Surely someone in LS would be self-reliant; self-entertainable. The admissions/LSAT process should surely mellow 'em out. Nope. Was def proven wrong.
Quote from: cui bono? on July 05, 2007, 11:17:18 AMQuote from: Massa' on July 05, 2007, 10:47:43 AMQuote from: Galt on July 05, 2007, 10:44:22 AMQuote from: 2Lacoste on July 05, 2007, 10:41:50 AMQuote from: cui bono? on July 05, 2007, 10:09:09 AMLMAO. this question keeps on being asked every cycle is seems (if u did a search like 10 things will pop up). The attitude of PLS II is dating as a release. I say, date in ur second semester if u must. 1L, 1st semester hell no. I have a strong no dating policy in my particular ls. Neighboring schools... fine. Long distance...fine. But have to veto the whole dating in your particular school. Break up, then that's one person that u may think u have to avoid. Unnecessary potential drama. Not a good look. Anything that causes u drama in ls needs to be dropped. Dating in your school is a bad look. Dating in your university is slightly better if it's large. I did the dating within the university jump-off second semester; again, not a good look. But dating long distance or someone who ain't at the school is fine.I humbly disagree. I do too. I don't see why two adults can't have a romantic relationship just cause they go to school together. Just be grown about it and it's fine. Just because folks go to LS does not mean they're grown. LS is kinda like high school all over again- only this time we're on our own and drive our own cars. Still wit the lockers and still with petty drama. "ooooh I saw so and so studying with such and such in the library but then he was studing with someone else on friday" gettheheckoutta here! Never thought anyone in LS could be needy. Surely someone in LS would be self-reliant; self-entertainable. The admissions/LSAT process should surely mellow 'em out. Nope. Was def proven wrong. eh college was like highschool too...if you dealt with ish in college, i'm sure you can deal with it in ls.ppl should man up and go on about their business.
I'll be damned if I'd let a bunch of childish law students and their gossip deter me from dating a woman I wanted.