Quote from: donwario on March 13, 2008, 06:14:03 PMQuote from: sweett on June 19, 2007, 02:57:28 PMyour thoughts? in terms of prestige/rep/street credWake Forest is far better in terms of student and faculty quality. I think the "man on the street" might be more impressed by the UNC name. The most troubling occurance at UNC is their money problem and loss of top faculty. It would be a concern for me in this rankings-obsessed world.Why do you say student body quality is better? Wake takes anyone with a pulse and a 160, so long as the GPA is over 2.0. UNC is much more difficult to get into, and they tend to require a very solid GPA even with a great LSAT score.
Quote from: sweett on June 19, 2007, 02:57:28 PMyour thoughts? in terms of prestige/rep/street credWake Forest is far better in terms of student and faculty quality. I think the "man on the street" might be more impressed by the UNC name. The most troubling occurance at UNC is their money problem and loss of top faculty. It would be a concern for me in this rankings-obsessed world.
your thoughts? in terms of prestige/rep/street cred
Quote from: Temporary Relief Assistant Trailer Park Supervisor on March 15, 2008, 10:55:25 AMQuote from: donwario on March 13, 2008, 06:14:03 PMQuote from: sweett on June 19, 2007, 02:57:28 PMyour thoughts? in terms of prestige/rep/street credWake Forest is far better in terms of student and faculty quality. I think the "man on the street" might be more impressed by the UNC name. The most troubling occurance at UNC is their money problem and loss of top faculty. It would be a concern for me in this rankings-obsessed world.Why do you say student body quality is better? Wake takes anyone with a pulse and a 160, so long as the GPA is over 2.0. UNC is much more difficult to get into, and they tend to require a very solid GPA even with a great LSAT score. Wake's 25th percentile is 161
Quote from: donwario on March 15, 2008, 11:53:39 AMQuote from: Temporary Relief Assistant Trailer Park Supervisor on March 15, 2008, 10:55:25 AMQuote from: donwario on March 13, 2008, 06:14:03 PMQuote from: sweett on June 19, 2007, 02:57:28 PMyour thoughts? in terms of prestige/rep/street credWake Forest is far better in terms of student and faculty quality. I think the "man on the street" might be more impressed by the UNC name. The most troubling occurance at UNC is their money problem and loss of top faculty. It would be a concern for me in this rankings-obsessed world.Why do you say student body quality is better? Wake takes anyone with a pulse and a 160, so long as the GPA is over 2.0. UNC is much more difficult to get into, and they tend to require a very solid GPA even with a great LSAT score. Wake's 25th percentile is 161Ok, maybe it is more like 162+. The point is, UNC is a traditionally stronger school that is more difficult to get into, and the only reason Wake's LSAT numbers seem decent is because the school is small and admits applicants with solid LSAT scores and brutal GPAs, while UNC rejects every non-NC applicant below a 3.5 GPA.