Law School Discussion

Poll

Is Radiohead insignificant?

Yes, their best days are behind them.
No, they are still an excellent live band and will make a comeback soon
Radiohead was never significant

Is Radiohead no longer significant?

Hank Rearden

  • *****
  • 8243
  • Zurich is stained
    • View Profile
Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« on: June 19, 2007, 11:49:34 AM »
Seriously, what happened to this band?  At the turn of the century, Radiohead had just released The Bends, OK Computer, and finally Kid A.  Their last two releases, while having their moments, were not as good as any of those three, and they haven't released an album in more than four years.  Last year Thom Yorke released a kind of interesting solo effort, and the band has been talking about an upcoming album for two years now, but they keep pushing the date back.  Meanwhile, bands like the Arcade Fire and Spoon have captured the fans Radiohead once counted as their own (see the new Spoon song, "The Underdog").  Anyway, I'm worried.

Captain

  • ****
  • 3317
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2007, 11:50:39 AM »
I voted "never significant" because Radiohead sucks.

Hank Rearden

  • *****
  • 8243
  • Zurich is stained
    • View Profile
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2007, 11:58:25 AM »
I voted "never significant" because Radiohead sucks.

You were listening to Britney Spears at the time I gather. 

Captain

  • ****
  • 3317
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2007, 12:27:34 PM »
I voted "never significant" because Radiohead sucks.

You were listening to Britney Spears at the time I gather. 

Cream actually. Classic Rock, Blues and the occasional Funk are my musical preference.

ptown

  • ****
  • 661
    • View Profile
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2007, 12:31:14 PM »
Radiohead blows

especially when they covered Be Quiet and Drive, which was uber-lame

Captain

  • ****
  • 3317
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2007, 12:33:49 PM »
Radiohead blows

especially when they covered Be Quiet and Drive, which was uber-lame

OMG WANNA BE INTERWEB FRIENDS?

Edna St. Vincent Millay

  • ****
  • 225
  • "Portrait of a Poetess"
    • View Profile
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2007, 12:38:14 PM »
i think many non-radiohead fans just haven't heard the right song for them. i recommend "no surprises," "stop whispering," and "fake plastic trees."

i don't want to think that their best days are behind them.

GraphiteDirigible

  • ****
  • 1118
  • Hey there fancypants.
    • View Profile
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2007, 12:44:11 PM »
I voted "never significant" because Radiohead sucks.

You were listening to Britney Spears at the time I gather. 

Cream actually. Classic Rock, Blues and the occasional Funk are my musical preference.

Cream actually blows. If you're going to list classic rock at least list something good.

And if all you can list is classic rock, blues, and the occasional funk, you don't really like music enough to comment or you're too close minded for this thread.

Captain

  • ****
  • 3317
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2007, 12:49:59 PM »
I voted "never significant" because Radiohead sucks.

You were listening to Britney Spears at the time I gather. 

Cream actually. Classic Rock, Blues and the occasional Funk are my musical preference.

Cream actually blows. If you're going to list classic rock at least list something good.

And if all you can list is classic rock, blues, and the occasional funk, you don't really like music enough to comment or you're too close minded for this thread.
:( Your flame was mean!

Absolutely, I'm horribly closeminded. Radiohead rocks. OMG WHERE DID I GO WRONG!

Captain

  • ****
  • 3317
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Is Radiohead no longer significant?
« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2007, 12:50:46 PM »
I voted "never significant" because Radiohead sucks.

You were listening to Britney Spears at the time I gather. 

Cream actually. Classic Rock, Blues and the occasional Funk are my musical preference.

To continue ganging up on poor CL, any appreciator of rock music would certainly see the talent and awesomeness of Radiohead in songs like Just, Climbing up The Walls, etc, some of Radiohead's "harder" stuff.  I think a lot of people have only heard Creep on the radio and thought Radiohead was just one of those one-hit-wonder British bands.

Dude, Creep is probably the only Radiohead song I find bearable.