Total Members Voted: 22
Quote from: Galt on June 08, 2007, 12:48:43 AMIf the recent immigrant wants to be an attorney for the government, then there might be more of a problem because of security concerns etc.I don't understand what kind of security concerns there exist. There're hundreds of ways for terrorists to come to this country without becoming a lawyer. Wouldn't it be a little expensive and time-consuming to make a terrorist go to a law school and become a US lawyer?
If the recent immigrant wants to be an attorney for the government, then there might be more of a problem because of security concerns etc.
Quote from: BearlyLegal on June 08, 2007, 07:18:50 AMYes, they should be allowed. It's so easy to be a lawyer for the government, even a caveman can do it...sh*t, worse than a caveman. Monica Goodling could do it.that's VERY debatable
Yes, they should be allowed. It's so easy to be a lawyer for the government, even a caveman can do it...sh*t, worse than a caveman. Monica Goodling could do it.
Quote from: Galt on June 08, 2007, 12:59:06 AMQuote from: ohhhyeah on June 08, 2007, 12:55:51 AMQuote from: Galt on June 08, 2007, 12:48:43 AMyou mean U.S. Attorneys?AUSA?Justice department?or just regular attorneys?Nobody should be an attorney in the US without going to law school imo. If an immigrant goes to law school and is proficient in the law, I don't see what's holding him back from being an attorney...If the recent immigrant wants to be an attorney for the government, then there might be more of a problem because of security concerns etc.I believe that the issue of an immigrant wishing to become a government attorney should be taken into consideration on a contingency basis. Security checks should be in place for positions of authority in government for both citizens and recent immigrants. I don't believe in going in with the mindset that immigrants alone will be security concerns in positions of power. All individuals that seek these positions should be of good moral character and should undergo a screening process.Then again, I'm a Canadian and we seem to be a bit more accepting of immigrants I think the issue is moot because I believe you have to be a citizen to work for the Fed. Gov'tBut I assume you would feel the same way in terms of security concerns for a recent immigrant that recently attained citizenship in the US. I am unsure as to how long the process is in the US but in Canada it is generally 3 years after being a landed immigrant that an individual can obtain citizenship. If it is similar then they would still be fairly recent "immigrants" to the country, would they not?
Quote from: ohhhyeah on June 08, 2007, 12:55:51 AMQuote from: Galt on June 08, 2007, 12:48:43 AMyou mean U.S. Attorneys?AUSA?Justice department?or just regular attorneys?Nobody should be an attorney in the US without going to law school imo. If an immigrant goes to law school and is proficient in the law, I don't see what's holding him back from being an attorney...If the recent immigrant wants to be an attorney for the government, then there might be more of a problem because of security concerns etc.I believe that the issue of an immigrant wishing to become a government attorney should be taken into consideration on a contingency basis. Security checks should be in place for positions of authority in government for both citizens and recent immigrants. I don't believe in going in with the mindset that immigrants alone will be security concerns in positions of power. All individuals that seek these positions should be of good moral character and should undergo a screening process.Then again, I'm a Canadian and we seem to be a bit more accepting of immigrants I think the issue is moot because I believe you have to be a citizen to work for the Fed. Gov't
Quote from: Galt on June 08, 2007, 12:48:43 AMyou mean U.S. Attorneys?AUSA?Justice department?or just regular attorneys?Nobody should be an attorney in the US without going to law school imo. If an immigrant goes to law school and is proficient in the law, I don't see what's holding him back from being an attorney...If the recent immigrant wants to be an attorney for the government, then there might be more of a problem because of security concerns etc.I believe that the issue of an immigrant wishing to become a government attorney should be taken into consideration on a contingency basis. Security checks should be in place for positions of authority in government for both citizens and recent immigrants. I don't believe in going in with the mindset that immigrants alone will be security concerns in positions of power. All individuals that seek these positions should be of good moral character and should undergo a screening process.Then again, I'm a Canadian and we seem to be a bit more accepting of immigrants
you mean U.S. Attorneys?AUSA?Justice department?or just regular attorneys?Nobody should be an attorney in the US without going to law school imo. If an immigrant goes to law school and is proficient in the law, I don't see what's holding him back from being an attorney...If the recent immigrant wants to be an attorney for the government, then there might be more of a problem because of security concerns etc.
J, if you didn't bring enough penis for everyone, you shouldn't have brought any penis at all.
Quote from: sg7007 on June 08, 2007, 03:04:04 AMQuote from: Galt on June 08, 2007, 12:48:43 AMIf the recent immigrant wants to be an attorney for the government, then there might be more of a problem because of security concerns etc.I don't understand what kind of security concerns there exist. There're hundreds of ways for terrorists to come to this country without becoming a lawyer. Wouldn't it be a little expensive and time-consuming to make a terrorist go to a law school and become a US lawyer?Speaking as a current bar exam applicant, any security concern issues that might be raised are more than killed by the 20 page character and fitness portion of the bar application. The bar gets into your life like the CIA.
TS/SSBI here, and it was a cake walk. Hardest part was the interview with the DipSec *cough*CIA*cough* guy who obviously had experience debriefing defectors. I know that the SCI's tougher, though. I don't think I'll have any problems with the C&F portion of the bar, either. I was too good a kid and an adult.
I'm not show-offy.
Any full citizen should be allowed to practice law. Law school is unnecessary.
Quote from: Lochner Rising on June 09, 2007, 12:35:24 AMAny full citizen should be allowed to practice law. Law school is unnecessary. In all honesty, I have no clue why law school is 3 years. 2 at most is what it takes.