Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0  (Read 287 times)

Captain

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3366
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« on: June 05, 2007, 11:51:23 AM »
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/05/ap3788773.html

An appeals court said a new federal policy against accidentally aired profanities on TV and radio was invalid, noting that vulgar language had become so common that even President Bush has been heard using expletives.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday in favor of a Fox Television-led challenge to the policy and returned the case to the Federal Communications Commission to let the agency try to explain how its policy was not "arbitrary and capricious." The court said it doubted the FCC could.

The broadcasters had asked the appeals court last year to invalidate the FCC's conclusion that profanity-laced broadcasts on four shows were indecent, even though no fines were issued. The FCC said the "F-word" in any context "inherently has a sexual connotation" and can be subject to enforcement action.

The appeals court said some of the FCC's explanations for its new policy, reversing a more lenient policy in place for nearly three decades, were "divorced from reality."

The court noted that even President Bush was heard one day telling British Prime Minister Tony Blair that the United Nations needed to "get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this s---."

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told The Associated Press that the ruling will make it difficult to impose fines for indecency.

"Practically, this makes it difficult to go forward on a lot of the cases that are in front of us," he said. An appeal was being considered, he said.

The FCC found its ban was violated by a Dec. 9, 2002, broadcast of the Billboard Music Awards in which singer Cher used the phrase "F--- 'em" and a Dec. 10, 2003, Billboard awards show in which reality show star Nicole Richie said, "Have you ever tried to get cow s--- out of a Prada purse? It's not so f------ simple."

In a majority opinion written by Judge Rosemary Pooler, the appeals court questioned whether the FCC's indecency test could survive First Amendment scrutiny.

"We are sympathetic to the networks' contention that the FCC's indecency test is undefined, indiscernible, inconsistent and consequently unconstitutionally vague," she wrote.

Fox Broadcasting praised the ruling, saying "government regulation of content serves no purpose other than to chill artistic expression in violation of the First Amendment." It said viewers can decide appropriate viewing content for themselves, using parental control technologies.

The new policy was put in place after a January 2003 NBC broadcast of the Golden Globes awards show, in which U2 lead singer Bono uttered the phrase "f------ brilliant."

FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps said the decision was disappointing to him and millions of parents but "doesn't change the FCC's legal obligation to enforce the indecency statute."

"So any broadcaster who sees this decision as a green light to send more gratuitous sex and violence into our homes would be making a huge mistake," Copps said. "The FCC has a duty to find a way to breathe life into the laws that protect our kids."


Associated Press writer John Dunbar in Washington also contributed to this report.


Copyright 2007 Associated Press.
VIP.

mrdunson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2007, 11:56:20 AM »
That's awesome.  I've been pushing for a greater acceptance of cursing my entire life.

.@#!*.

ě

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4603
  • non sequitur
    • View Profile
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2007, 12:17:48 PM »
I'd like to be the first to say about f-ing time.

Captain

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3366
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2007, 01:18:12 PM »
How long until Fox becomes  the first broadcast network to air hardcore porn?
VIP.

mrdunson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2007, 01:18:56 PM »
Are you posting from a cell phone?  Kill self.

ě

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4603
  • non sequitur
    • View Profile
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2007, 01:21:58 PM »
How long until Fox becomes  the first broadcast network to air hardcore porn?

About 1 day shorter than when their subscriptions go through the roof ;)

Captain

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3366
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2007, 01:23:41 PM »
Whoah, you can tell?

I'll get right on the killself... thnx.
VIP.

mrdunson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2007, 01:27:25 PM »
There is a little icon next to the top of your post.  It's all good, but I'd like to warn you about the problems of addiction, which I know about firsthand.

__

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 17455
  • Chowdah mmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Broadcasters 1, FCC 0
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2007, 05:49:24 PM »
I like profanity... and muppets.
sometimes I put hot chinese mustard up my nose to see if I'm still alive