Petition to raise senior citizen status to 400 posts, full member to 100 posts.

[Should senior citizen status be raised to 400 posts, full member status raised to 100 posts?]

Should senior citizen status be raised to 400 posts, full member status raised to 100 posts?

Yes

No

[superiorlobe]

Currently you only need 100 posts to become a "Senior Citizen" and after only 15 posts (!!!!) you become a "Full Member".

This is ridiculous.  There is no way to distinguish the true seniour citizens who have upwards of 1,000 and sometimes upwards of 2,000 posts from some dude who is practically a newbie with only 100 posts.

I submit that AT LEAST 400 posts be required for Senior Citizen status.  Also, at least 100 posts should be required to become a full member.

I also propose the new category of "Venerated Citizen" for those with over 10,000 posts.

Please sign the petition if you think my proposal is a good idea.

[Tom]

Currently you only need 100 posts to become a "Senior Citizen" and after only 15 posts (!!!!) you become a "Full Member".

This is ridiculous.  There is no way to distinguish the true seniour citizens who have upwards of 1,000 and sometimes upwards of 2,000 posts from some dude who is practically a newbie with only 100 posts.

I submit that AT LEAST 400 posts be required for Senior Citizen status.  Also, at least 100 posts should be required to become a full member.

I also propose the new category of "Venerated Citizen" for those with over 10,000 posts.

Please sign the petition if you think my proposal is a good idea.

Are you serious?

[dr_draino]

I'll sign it, though I'd edit by saying "newbie" should be cut off at 25 and "jr. member" started at 50.

[gobears]

I'll sign it too, but only after I reach 100.  And only if all people who were already senior citizens before this point, but have less than 400 posts, can still maintain their senior citizen status.

[jacy85]

I dont' think they can do that...I think there can only be 1 number.  So if its set at 400, no one under 400 would keep their sr. citizen status...

I'll sign it too, but only after I reach 100. And only if all people who were already senior citizens before this point, but have less than 400 posts, can still maintain their senior citizen status.

[TheDecline]

I wouldn't be against it, but I don't really see the point.

[gobears]

I dont' think they can do that...I think there can only be 1 number.  So if its set at 400, no one under 400 would keep their sr. citizen status...

Shoot, foiled again!  But that's cool, I signed the petition and voted "yes" even though I have less than 100 posts 'cos it does sound pretty fair.

[Candide]

Quality > Quantity

[M2]

This should have been on the site suggestions board...

[casino]

sr. citizen implies old, however, it is easy to gain this status in just a few days, a half a night for some.

i would up sr. citizen status to 1000 posts.  there are only a handful of peeps with over a thousand.

or maybe they could change names to partner, associate: you know, lawyery type designations.  it would be more fitting.

casino