According to Martindale:Villanova grads in Philly: 1,008. Temple grads in Philly: 1,362.In terms of reach, id say Penn, Temple, then Villanova - the diff in the latter two not being as big. But still, i think temple is stronger, might be cause its actually inside the city as well. BTW, if you cant tell, ill prob be going to Temple, but i got into both.
So another impression of villanova that I get is that it is more career-orientated than other schools. It places extraordinarily well given its rank, yet it's hardly mentioned in the Leitner reports. I take that as a sign that Villanova faculty do not participate very much in academic affairs-- theoretical papers, academic discussions, and spend more time training the kids to work for corporate firms in NYC, Philly, Jersey, etc. Am I right or wrong on this?
Journeyman, I am dumbfounded as to how you got into IU and W&L with your numbers. 155 LSAT and you applied to Vanderbilt? Honestly?
The LS building is kinda old school, but they'll have a parking garage next year. The student body is pretty WASPy and timid from what I've seen in visiting. Pretty corporate oriented, although they say they are big on public service. Couldn't tell that by the ambitions of the students I talked to though.
Quote from: Booyakasha2 on May 11, 2007, 01:48:05 PMAccording to Martindale:Villanova grads in Philly: 1,008. Temple grads in Philly: 1,362.In terms of reach, id say Penn, Temple, then Villanova - the diff in the latter two not being as big. But still, i think temple is stronger, might be cause its actually inside the city as well. BTW, if you cant tell, ill prob be going to Temple, but i got into both.Curious what these numbers would look like if you added NYC and DC. If Villanova has more people leaving Philly for NYC and DC, then obviously the numbers for Temple grads in Philly would be higher, due to their inability/lack of desire to go to DC or NYC.