Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name  (Read 6400 times)

gratif

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 196
  • 2.7/167
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2007, 02:42:30 AM »
Nah.  She's a stupid female private part.  Just like gay is the new black, "faggot" is the new "n-word."  It's appropriate in certain contexts, only not when weilded with malice.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27223
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2007, 08:31:54 AM »
no, that one yours.

putz.


no...aye say...

you, putzz. :D

try less masturbation and more thought.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27223
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2007, 08:34:16 AM »
nominations now being taken.

You are a hypocrite but you are not alone. I have seen/heard people calling Coulter many vile things because of what she called Edwards. What she did was wrong. However, you have no moral ground to stand on if you do to her what she did to Edwards.

If Edwards were to respond in kind, he would be just as bad as Coulter.

julie not call coulter anything.  julie  have only good word for coulter.

and it very good word.

julie even have one for you.

overthehill

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #13 on: April 02, 2007, 09:18:48 AM »
Nah.  She's a stupid female private part.  Just like gay is the new black, "faggot" is the new "n-word."  It's appropriate in certain contexts, only not when weilded with malice.

So, gays and blacks are a protected class but women are not?  Perhaps one day women will be the new black (in your mind).

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27223
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #14 on: April 02, 2007, 09:38:41 AM »
get it straight.  women new blacks.  blacks new gays.

do julie have explain everything?

The Poster

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 11956
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - dontreallyknowmuch
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #15 on: April 02, 2007, 10:08:27 AM »
get it straight. women new blacks. blacks new gays.

do julie have explain everything?

what jules then?
quote Stanley J. Watson III
you are doomed in the fated sense, but that's completely irrelevant because that's only from the viewpoint of someone who is not constrained by time. since you are temporal, for all intents and purposes you have the power to change your future

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27223
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #16 on: April 02, 2007, 10:18:51 AM »
julie julie.  not that clear already?

gratif

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 196
  • 2.7/167
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #17 on: April 02, 2007, 01:42:50 PM »
Nah.  She's a stupid female private part.  Just like gay is the new black, "faggot" is the new "n-word."  It's appropriate in certain contexts, only not when weilded with malice.

So, gays and blacks are a protected class but women are not?  Perhaps one day women will be the new black (in your mind).

Women are a majority.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27223
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #18 on: April 02, 2007, 02:33:33 PM »
yes, we have quite advantage.

The Poster

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 11956
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - dontreallyknowmuch
    • View Profile
Re: john edwards should call ann coulter bad name
« Reply #19 on: April 02, 2007, 03:04:13 PM »
julie julie. not that clear already?

julie yam what julie yam?
quote Stanley J. Watson III
you are doomed in the fated sense, but that's completely irrelevant because that's only from the viewpoint of someone who is not constrained by time. since you are temporal, for all intents and purposes you have the power to change your future