Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: US News Not Leaked, Released  (Read 182478 times)

Tuttipoopoo

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 529
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #100 on: March 27, 2007, 02:59:23 PM »
BTW --- I never paid for the 08 edition.  I'm logged into an account with the 07 edition and all the new rankings are there. 

Are the rankings available to everybody now?
Waiting.....

Pugnacious

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 784
  • C'est law vie...
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #101 on: March 27, 2007, 02:59:54 PM »
But Z!! OMFG TX DROPPED 2 SPOTS!!!11!1one! Now anyone who goes there is going to be stuck in some TTT job!

 ::)

true dat

/i'll take their spot

that was my FIRST thought when i saw it. I thought "wow. it's possible that someone might actually choose another school over Texas because of this. I might get in off the wait list!" Because I'll certainly take Texas over the new 16th ranked schools.

Why no love for USC?

1. I believe Texas to be a better school than USC or indeed many of the T14 schools.
2. I'm a Texan, and I'd love to return to Austin. LA scares me as my other post indicates.
3. I do like USC, and its inderdisciplinary academic study really appeals to me, but that doesn't mean I'd pick it over Texas.
4. Texas is much cheaper.

Ok those are valid reasons - still hope to meet you at ASW though!
My cycle is officially over. Boalt Law 2010!

http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=pugattack

muffin83

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #102 on: March 27, 2007, 03:00:20 PM »
woooohooooo BU.

Johnny Stuffs His Mouth

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 6223
  • 1/2 of the Golden Couple
    • View Profile
    • http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=johnkorean
    • Email
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #103 on: March 27, 2007, 03:01:15 PM »
8 schools in the top 10 have to settle for ties. Stupid.

Current methodology sucks. Everyone knows NYU is not > Columbia and Chicago, Penn is not equal to Chicago, and Duke is not equal to UVA.

The reputation ratings are reality.

What methodology is this based on? I'm assuming reputation ratings, since they're reality. So the quality of a school now is determined by people who haven't been to law school in 30 years? Why is that a better indicator?

Oooh engaged by Johnny on the spot!

You have my opinion. This is too much to get into now, and it would just be a retread of many other discussions in this forum, anyway. I just don't feel motivated to type a book now. But you should go ahead.  

For what it's worth, I think I tend to agree with you maybe. I think NYU is probably a bit overrated, but I don't mind reaping those benfits.  ;D
I'll join the cool crowd: 3.23/173
Blinded by the light (Attending): UVA!!! Wahoo 2010!!!
Wrapped up like a feminine hygiene product (Accepted): UVA!! Fordham, Georgetown!!! NYU!!!!!!!!!
Another odor in the night (Rejected): Harvard
Let's go LSAT score! http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=johnkorean

iscoredawaitlist

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2575
  • The beagle puppy of anticipation
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #104 on: March 27, 2007, 03:01:28 PM »
But Z!! OMFG TX DROPPED 2 SPOTS!!!11!1one! Now anyone who goes there is going to be stuck in some TTT job!

 ::)

true dat

/i'll take their spot

that was my FIRST thought when i saw it. I thought "wow. it's possible that someone might actually choose another school over Texas because of this. I might get in off the wait list!" Because I'll certainly take Texas over the new 16th ranked schools.

Why no love for USC?

1. I believe Texas to be a better school than USC or indeed many of the T14 schools.
2. I'm a Texan, and I'd love to return to Austin. LA scares me as my other post indicates.
3. I do like USC, and its inderdisciplinary academic study really appeals to me, but that doesn't mean I'd pick it over Texas.
4. Texas is much cheaper.

Ok those are valid reasons - still hope to meet you at ASW though!

I'll be there!

Kitty782

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 201
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #105 on: March 27, 2007, 03:02:00 PM »
I have absolutely no reason to feel this way, but I can't believe that GW dropped below BU.  It just doesn't seem right to me. 
Fordham 2010

Diecisiete

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #106 on: March 27, 2007, 03:02:17 PM »
tag...this is pretty entertaining. Every year I expect Chicago to move up a spot, but now its 10 years at #6 (Ok, I really haven't waited a decade...that would be strange :P)
CLS 2L

_____________________

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
    • View Profile

_____________________

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #108 on: March 27, 2007, 03:04:52 PM »
looking at that though i think i was thinking about leiter's rankings.

Special Agent Dana Scully

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 8991
  • aka MCB
    • View Profile
Re: US News Not Leaked, Released
« Reply #109 on: March 27, 2007, 03:05:50 PM »
nyu > cls?

 :'(
Columbia 3L