Federal ban on assault weapons ends today... Thoughts?

[The ZAPINATOR]

I still want an Uzi, and a tank!

ZAP

[lucky7]

Can I borrow your tank and go through the McDonald's drive-thru?

[The ZAPINATOR]

Totally!

ZAP

[lucky7]

yay!

[Tobias Beecher]

Can I borrow your tank and go through the McDonald's drive-thru?

you are gonna get fat....

and in that case...

we have to invade you.

 

[M2]

Back to the original question, I think that the original ban was kind of pointless.  I mean everyone thinks that the ban is against "machine guns" when it's not. The ban is against cosmetic features found on rifles.  Here is the criteria that would get a rifle banned. (has to meet two to quailify for as an assault rifle)
1. A folding stock or telescopic stock
2. A pistol grip
3. A bayonet mount
4. A flash suppressor

You must be new here...we don't actually discuss things

[The ZAPINATOR]

Not anymore.  Those days are a thing of the past.  It's not like we actually got anywhere when we did... wasted effort.

ZAP

[Bisquick]

yeah.. plus you can't get post counts

[The ZAPINATOR]

Good call.  From the father of post-count gerrymandering himself.  I thank you on behalf of all of LSD for that thread.  Is it the longest ever yet?

ZAP

[Bisquick]

yeah, by a large margin.  you can chack it by clicking on home, then scrolling down to the bottom and clicking on "more stats"