.

[lsatismylifenow]

.

[bubDread]

where do i find kaplan's discussion?

[Ghilly]

where do i find kaplan's discussion?

Here

http://www.kaptest.com/Kaplan/Article/Law/LSAT/Learn_About_the_LSAT/LSAT-Analysis/LSAT-podcast-archive.html

As to the op, is it always this confusing to figure out the experimental or is this unprecedented?

[bubDread]

um that one is from Dec. test.

[bubDread]

where do i find kaplan's discussion?

Here

http://www.kaptest.com/Kaplan/Article/Law/LSAT/Learn_About_the_LSAT/LSAT-Analysis/LSAT-podcast-archive.html

As to the op, is it always this confusing to figure out the experimental or is this unprecedented?

I cannot see the feb analysis.  Are we mistakenly listening to the Dec analysis?

[turnitout]

I had the same format as you did Prof, and I am almost positive that my LRs were 26 Qs (1), 25 Qs (3), 25 (4). When I saw the first section was 26, I remember feeling surprised because recently, most of the LRs have been 25 Qs. When I saw the 3rd was 25, after the RC having 27 Qs, I knew that if the games weren't >22 Qs, a 26 Q LR section would probably count. So when the LR section after the break was 25 Qs, I figured the first LR section was most likely the one that counted. After seeing the 22 Q games section, I figured that I was almost certainly correct.

[Ghilly]

where do i find kaplan's discussion?

Here

http://www.kaptest.com/Kaplan/Article/Law/LSAT/Learn_About_the_LSAT/LSAT-Analysis/LSAT-podcast-archive.html

As to the op, is it always this confusing to figure out the experimental or is this unprecedented?

I cannot see the feb analysis.  Are we mistakenly listening to the Dec analysis?

This is the page it was on last night.  I honestly think they may have taken it down because I can't find it!!!

http://surveys.kaptest.com/instantanalysis/lsat/blog/?p=80

[Jets]

Maybe they took it down due to my e-mail?

[turnitout]

haha awesome

[Jets]

Nope, it's still up: http://surveys.kaptest.com/instantanalysis/lsat/blog/