Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: SFLSD: Oh! The inhumanities.  (Read 2658823 times)

This is wrong.

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1453
  • Dear LawDog3...
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67290 on: April 12, 2009, 03:20:11 AM »
We haven't really quite gotten to facial challenges vs. as-applied in conlaw, but I think that's what I'm getting at? Not inherently gendered, but in my experience mostly used in a gendered way, i.e. I rant and rave but somehow my brothers/dad/bf never quite manage it, despite having similar opinions, argumentation styles, and passion levels. I completely understand if that's not your experience, but I would remind the MALES IN THE ROOM that PERHAPS THEY ARE MOTIVATED TO IGNORE THIS REALITY OF WOMEN'S LIVED EXPERIENCES OR AT LEAST OVERLOOK IT ALL CAPS OF COURSE BECAUSE I AM A HYSTERICAL FEMALE.

I had a funnier ending to that, but I got distracted because Bruce Springsteen concert DVD just got to "The River" which is such a good, but dark, song? He kills his whole family at the end, right? Or that's at least a strongly-contemplated possibility?

MY LIVED EXPERIENCE IS INHERENTLY MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Okay?  Okay.  Good.

::pats on head::

Whoah, whoah, whoah. All this ranting and raving. Calm down, dash.

Also they don't make jew-y ice cream. (read: it's passover and we didn't find any passover coke, i.e. cane sugar coke, and I am already losing patience with this jewy poo, and it's only day three.)

Also of course I would get fat and be a fat alone harpy shrieker person. Oh, ice cream. The cause of, and solution to, all life's problems.


<-- unimpressed.

I LLOLed.
I do not like hats.
I do not like them on bats.
I would not like them near cats.
I would not like them made out of mats.

archival

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 685
    • View Profile
    • intj
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67291 on: April 12, 2009, 11:22:11 AM »
Harper's index online!  Happy happy joy joy.

http://harpers.org/index/?q=bourbon
But how do you deal with someone who rejects your broad moral principles?
I kill them.

This is wrong.

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1453
  • Dear LawDog3...
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67292 on: April 12, 2009, 11:28:44 AM »
Harper's index online!  Happy happy joy joy.

http://harpers.org/index/?q=bourbon


For reasons that shall remain a mystery (for the time being), your choice of "bourbon" as an example was wacky.
I do not like hats.
I do not like them on bats.
I would not like them near cats.
I would not like them made out of mats.

Elephant Lee

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4786
  • Maybe ju an' me are amigos!
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67293 on: April 12, 2009, 12:54:13 PM »
The Easter story features men (wrongly) thinking that women are (being) irrational.  :)

and as the women were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, the men said to them, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead?

 6"He is not here, but He has risen Remember how He spoke to you while He was still in Galilee,

 7saying that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again."

 8And they remembered His words,

 9and returned from the tomb and reported all these things to the eleven and to all the rest.

 10Now they were Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary the mother of James; also the other women with them were telling these things to the apostles.

 11But these words appeared to them as nonsense, and they would not believe them.
This was my country
This frightful and this angry land

"I guess she was a hooker, that makes sense, those shorts didn't really look all that comfortable." -Dash

mugatu

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 22183
  • I'll show YOU pacifist.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67294 on: April 12, 2009, 04:10:34 PM »
Harper's index online!  Happy happy joy joy.

http://harpers.org/index/?q=bourbon


cool!

there was brunch.

i'm getting ready to drive back up to SF.
Let me show you Derelicte. It is a fashion, a way of life inspired by the very homeless, the vagrants, the crack whores that make this wonderful city so unique.

They're break-dance fighting.

Susan B. Anthony

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 6571
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67295 on: April 12, 2009, 04:45:29 PM »
if the apostles did it it has to be right!

Miss P

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 21337
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67296 on: April 12, 2009, 05:00:55 PM »
Harper's index online!  Happy happy joy joy.

http://harpers.org/index/?q=bourbon


Well if this isn't the loud ring of my bat phone, I don't know what is.  Damn.

Also, for Tommy,

Quote from: Harper's Index 10/92
Ratio of New York Met Bobby Bonilla’s annual salary to the value of his weight in gold: 5:1


***

LLOL, multiple times, over the last few pages.  Thanks, guys.
That's cool how you referenced a case.

Quote from: archival
I'm so far from the end of my tether right now that I reckon I could knit myself some socks with the slack.

dashrashi

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3601
    • View Profile
    • LSN
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67297 on: April 12, 2009, 06:02:57 PM »
This morning, I thought of one that I actually like when it's applied to me. When it's a guy, you call him persistent. But when it's me, no, I'm unrelenting. I see it as a backhanded acknowledgment of my power to thoroughly ruffle feathers.
This sig kills fascists.

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=dashrashi

Saw dashrashi's LSN site. Since she seems to use profanity, one could say that HYP does not necessarily mean class or refinement.

Susan B. Anthony

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 6571
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67298 on: April 12, 2009, 06:05:40 PM »
So...if I called you an unrelenting harpy, we'd come out about even and you wouldn't get mad?

Susan B. Anthony

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 6571
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: Feeling you.
« Reply #67299 on: April 12, 2009, 06:14:07 PM »
Two things about this:

1. Lame

2. Is it just me, or is that a really odd use of "hence"?