Law School Discussion

SFLSD: Oh! The inhumanities.

Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56570 on: November 05, 2008, 12:55:29 AM »
WHOA!

mugatu

  • *****
  • 21790
  • I'll show YOU pacifist.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56571 on: November 05, 2008, 12:56:16 AM »
i watched the speech again

and started crying again

<---so emotional

mugatu

  • *****
  • 21790
  • I'll show YOU pacifist.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56572 on: November 05, 2008, 01:05:38 AM »
Obama might win [place of origin].

::suddenly loves [place of origin]::

(the other state that can split e-votes)

mugatu

  • *****
  • 21790
  • I'll show YOU pacifist.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56573 on: November 05, 2008, 01:17:08 AM »
I'm having a tough time believing so few people in SF and LA voted.

Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56574 on: November 05, 2008, 02:43:25 AM »
I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE A COMEDIAN SENATOR* YET!!?!?!(!(!()%R*&()*%&)*(&#%

* ::recognizes that comedian senator is redundant::



Prop 8 is looking bad.  Am 2 in Florida too.  I'm glad Am. 48 in Colorado is looking like it got beat the @#!* down.


mbw

  • ****
  • 2426
  • TTTundra Law 2012
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56575 on: November 05, 2008, 06:31:24 AM »
Wow, my OH candidate ended up losing by 12K votes.  In a trending blue district and open seat.  Last poll had her up by 5.

My stupid ex-boss and the stupid campaign manager.  Women candidates should never put the fate of their campaigns completely in the hands of incompetent men.

goaliechica

  • *****
  • 6179
  • It's only forever - not long at all.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56576 on: November 05, 2008, 08:56:37 AM »
So 8 is down by 4 points (about 400,000 votes), but they have 2 million mail-in ballots left to count. It's not looking good, but there's still a chance.

Ugh. K went down hard :-\ At least 4 went down, but I'm sure we'll see it back again next year  >:(

And the train lost! At least it was losing last I checked  :-\ I really wanted the train.

::grumbles about people caring more about chickens than they do about people::

Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56577 on: November 05, 2008, 09:15:46 AM »
I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE A COMEDIAN SENATOR* YET!!?!?!(!(!()%R*&()*%&)*(&#%

* ::recognizes that comedian senator is redundant::


I KNOW!  I WANT A REAL COMEDIAN SENATOR!


goaliechica

  • *****
  • 6179
  • It's only forever - not long at all.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56578 on: November 05, 2008, 09:20:13 AM »
Wait, now it looks like the train is winning! Thank goodness for small favors?

I really do think that's good news, although it doesn't much make up for 8.

::still grumbles about chickens::

ETA: But oh dear! 9 won. Bah.

goaliechica

  • *****
  • 6179
  • It's only forever - not long at all.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: No on Prop 8.
« Reply #56579 on: November 05, 2008, 09:27:21 AM »
Okay, also, can we talk about how unfortunatel Michelle's dress was? I love that woman, but REALLY? She always looks so classic, and she chose last night to wear some crazy spider-man-looking get-up? I mean, really, those pictures will be in history books, woman.