Law School Discussion

SFLSD: Oh! The inhumanities.

obamacon

  • ****
  • 3125
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4810 on: March 21, 2007, 08:03:23 AM »
I have a feeling this CSPAN thing is a lot more entertaining without sound.  Inventing my own... Gore looks bored as hell, and is wondering why Joe Barton won't STFU.

The minimum question length on the hill is 10 minutes.

obamacon

  • ****
  • 3125
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4811 on: March 21, 2007, 08:08:13 AM »
woah, they subpoenad Miers and Rove.

Step one, hold them in contempt. Step two, forward this to the justice department for prosecution.

obamacon

  • ****
  • 3125
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4812 on: March 21, 2007, 08:13:22 AM »
woah, they subpoenad Miers and Rove.

Step one, hold them in contempt. Step two, forward this to the justice department for prosecution.

"Mr. Gonzalez, please prosecute your colleague Mr. Rove."

Yeah.

On a positive note, perhaps we'll get a further clarification of Executive Privilege from SCOTUS.

obamacon

  • ****
  • 3125
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4813 on: March 21, 2007, 08:27:08 AM »

On a strategy level, is that what the Dems are hoping for?  Supreme court pwnage of (at least some part of) executive privilege?

Are you looking forward to the Unitary executive theory being enshrined in American law as well?

obamacon

  • ****
  • 3125
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4814 on: March 21, 2007, 08:39:32 AM »
executive privilege was overruled in Watergate

Um, what?

obamacon

  • ****
  • 3125
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4815 on: March 21, 2007, 08:51:34 AM »
The issue of access to the tapes went all the way to the Supreme Court. On July 24, 1974, in United States v. Nixon, the Court (which did not include the recused Justice Rehnquist) ruled unanimously that claims of executive privilege over the tapes were void, and they further ordered him to surrender them to Jaworski. On July 30, he complied with the order and released the subpoenaed tapes."[/i]

Perhaps this is an instance of me failing to note how restricted that statement could be. For instance, you could have meant that EP was completely overruled or that it was only overruled in that specific instance.

obamacon

  • ****
  • 3125
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4816 on: March 21, 2007, 09:00:13 AM »

kirkcameronsgf

  • ****
  • 3333
  • Ever since I can remember, I been poppin' my colla
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4817 on: March 21, 2007, 10:04:04 AM »
This is just further evidence for my claim that Blake >>>> JT.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7RqCvF_PTE&NR

Not feelin' it, Sax.  Good try though.  :)

Le Docteur De Peste

  • ****
  • 1794
  • Ashes, ashes, we all fall down.
    • View Profile
Re: SFLSD: We're in ur unreads, messing up ur threadz.
« Reply #4818 on: March 21, 2007, 10:25:51 AM »
wtf, I just got text message spam on my cell phone.

HEADS WILL ROLL.   >:(

did you see my lsn spam?

no...


wtf, I just got text message spam on my cell phone.

HEADS WILL ROLL.   >:(

Was it porn?

Viagra.  lol.

Viagra, or "Vizzxazaagra000000"?