Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: WUSTL  (Read 24066 times)

t L

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2201
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #220 on: February 20, 2007, 07:34:23 PM »
got the binder today..very nice and well put together...nice advertising.

The DVD makes St. Louis look sorta cool.  DO NOT BE FOOLED!
Michigan 2L

Chandler Bing

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 653
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #221 on: February 20, 2007, 07:38:49 PM »
got the binder today..very nice and well put together...nice advertising.

The DVD makes St. Louis look sorta cool.  DO NOT BE FOOLED!

Why don't you think St. Louis is cool?
Monica (attending): Northwestern!
Rachel/Phoebe (still in the running): Northwestern $$, Chicago $
Janice(withdrawn): SLU, Loyola Chicago, Chicago-Kent, Depaul, UIUC, Duke, WUSTL

Cycle's over!

dcarealsattaker

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 179
  • "The Lidgebreaker"
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #222 on: February 20, 2007, 08:08:27 PM »
St. Louis is WAY underrated.  WashU is in a fun part of town for starters with Forest Park right across the street.  Not to mention that they have a pretty great baseball team.

Chandler Bing

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 653
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #223 on: February 20, 2007, 08:35:15 PM »
St. Louis is WAY underrated.  WashU is in a fun part of town for starters with Forest Park right across the street.  Not to mention that they have a pretty great baseball team.

Agreed. There are also quite a few fun neighborhoods that cater to people in their 20s pretty close to campus (Lafayette Square, the Landing, Washington Ave., etc.)
Monica (attending): Northwestern!
Rachel/Phoebe (still in the running): Northwestern $$, Chicago $
Janice(withdrawn): SLU, Loyola Chicago, Chicago-Kent, Depaul, UIUC, Duke, WUSTL

Cycle's over!

Captain

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3366
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #224 on: February 20, 2007, 10:31:34 PM »
St. Louis is WAY underrated.  WashU is in a fun part of town for starters with Forest Park right across the street.  Not to mention that they have a pretty great baseball team.

There is only one great baseball team, and it resides in the Bronx, thankyouverymuch.
VIP.

dcarealsattaker

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 179
  • "The Lidgebreaker"
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #225 on: February 20, 2007, 11:15:12 PM »
I prefer to debate how great Pujols is to whether or not A-Rod should be booed.  But that's just me.

Seriously though...hate the Red Sox.  HATE them.  So we're on the same side.

LuvHurtz

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 727
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #226 on: February 21, 2007, 02:33:37 AM »
I'm still waiting to hear from WUSTL. Does anyone know if they give a certain a number of weeks before you should expect a decision...or is there not a guaranteed date except for the April 10 deadline?

Captain

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3366
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #227 on: February 21, 2007, 10:03:10 AM »
I prefer to debate how great Pujols is to whether or not A-Rod should be booed.  But that's just me.

Seriously though...hate the Red Sox.  HATE them.  So we're on the same side.

Ok, you can be my friend then.
VIP.

bamf

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3381
  • legal eagle
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #228 on: February 21, 2007, 11:25:29 AM »
a little bored with some time to kill before class, so I watched some of the DVD ... on the tour it takes the (rather annoying) tour guides about 2 minutes to get star talking about the FREE BEER!
2L, Boston College Law

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bamf

Around from time to time.  Always willing to answer any Qs about BC, my '06/'07 cycle or law school in general ... PMs work better ...

Data

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
  • They call me Data.
    • View Profile
Re: WUSTL
« Reply #229 on: February 21, 2007, 12:04:29 PM »
Damn, guess those of us that got 0 emails are screwed?
Yale 2010