Law School Discussion

Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...

Data

  • ****
  • 354
  • They call me Data.
    • View Profile
Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« on: January 10, 2007, 10:56:43 AM »
your numbers? 

Why then do people repeatedly post everything but their stats.  Can someone explain?

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2007, 11:05:39 AM »
Idiocy, my friend.  Sheer idiocy.  And paranoia.  It's pathetic.

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2007, 11:17:15 AM »
 :D :D :D

What, me?  Vague? 




I was replying to the OP, for what it's worth.

Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2007, 11:22:50 AM »
I think it's best as a gauge if you use the previous cycle's numbers. 

Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2007, 11:23:34 AM »
I always find it informative to know someone with unknown #s got into a school I'm applying at.  I think to myself "If this guy or girl could make it with #s that may or may not be similar to mine maybe I have a chance." 

Sometimes I get worried when I see someone with unknown #s getting rejected at one of my schools.  I think to myself "what chance do I have if this unknown person with unknown #s didn't get in."


Johnny Stuffs His Mouth

  • *****
  • 6170
  • 1/2 of the Golden Couple
    • View Profile
    • http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=johnkorean
    • Email
Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2007, 11:29:21 AM »
I just always assumed that some people just went straight from high school to law school, and so they didn't have a UG GPA or an LSAT score. Is this wrong?

Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2007, 11:30:27 AM »
You can always fill in the info at the end of the cycle. After all, lsn is usually used for people to predict future cycles rather than look at current stats. We're all paranoid and don't want to screw up our chances due to something stupid like lsn.

Johnny Stuffs His Mouth

  • *****
  • 6170
  • 1/2 of the Golden Couple
    • View Profile
    • http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=johnkorean
    • Email
Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2007, 11:39:16 AM »
I just always assumed that some people just went straight from high school to law school, and so they didn't have a UG GPA or an LSAT score. Is this wrong?

Nope. Just as correct as you usually are.  Carry on my man.

Damn; how'd they do it? Why wasn't I told? You know, you'd think those smug bastards would at least have the decency not to gloat about it; they could at least make something up. Jerks.

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2007, 11:40:54 AM »
You can always fill in the info at the end of the cycle. After all, lsn is usually used for people to predict future cycles rather than look at current stats. We're all paranoid and don't want to screw up our chances due to something stupid like lsn.

i.e. you're all idiots.

Re: Isn't Lawschoolnumbers.com for...
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2007, 11:46:41 AM »
You can always fill in the info at the end of the cycle. After all, lsn is usually used for people to predict future cycles rather than look at current stats. We're all paranoid and don't want to screw up our chances due to something stupid like lsn.

i.e. you're all idiots.

my lsn has my numbers;