It's been brought to my attention that boss is my favorite poster
Quote from: Cookie Monster on January 06, 2007, 09:35:57 PMgeez...I really hope they're not waitlisting people just yet. I know some people get waitlist and deferred confused. Maybe that's the case? But then again, why would she be deferred if she didn't apply ED? My thoughts exactly. She's got decent numbers and is in-state, so unless she's actually a resident of another state and just attending UG here w/o residency it doesn't make sense. Some people are thinking that with applicant numbers down, more schools will use the WL and pull people off later to keep their acceptance rate low. But still, I can't see a school doing that this early when they could at least wait until after the Feb 1st deadline.
geez...I really hope they're not waitlisting people just yet. I know some people get waitlist and deferred confused. Maybe that's the case? But then again, why would she be deferred if she didn't apply ED?
And just cause this is all over the news here and thought you UT hopefuls would be interested...http://www.kxan.com/Global/story.asp?S=5904817Dozens of birds found dead of unknown causes in downtown Austin. Authorities tested the air and found nothing toxic and are removing the birds for testings/autopsies.I'm now on a campaign to get everyone withdraw their UT apps. It ain't worth the bird flu.
I think just about everyone with an LSAT less than 165, in state or not, got waitlisted or rejected last cycle. I don't think much has changed since then. Good luck, though.
Quote from: Donkeys, not Elephants on January 08, 2007, 11:53:13 AMI think just about everyone with an LSAT less than 165, in state or not, got waitlisted or rejected last cycle. I don't think much has changed since then. Good luck, though.And you're wrong. They admitted 320 people last cycle with an LSAT under 165.http://officialguide.lsac.org/OFFGUIDE/pdf/lsac6882.pdf