Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: The GW thread  (Read 85457 times)

1654134681665465

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 715
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1640 on: May 21, 2007, 10:10:08 PM »
Quote
  Emory's the better choice anyway. 

Boiled peanuts?

Captain

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3366
    • View Profile
    • http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/5526/thumbid5.jpg
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1641 on: May 21, 2007, 10:38:40 PM »
Emory's the better choice anyway. ;)
Said the guy going to USC... :(

What is special about a boiled peanut?
VIP.

1654134681665465

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 715
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1642 on: May 22, 2007, 12:12:12 AM »
I don't know if there is anything special about them, but they were by far the most random thing in Georgia. 

dcforlife

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 215
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1643 on: May 22, 2007, 03:11:37 PM »
As far as I can see, you're right... maybe they're looking to shake things up. Odd way to format a schedule... why not just list the class names as rows in the first column with their associated times to the right? I suppose PTers can derive their schedule, since it's only one section... looks like...

Contracts: M/T 6:00pm-7:50pm
Civ Pro: W/R 6:00pm-7:50pm
LRW: ?? twice a week after those classes

dcforlife

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 215
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1644 on: May 22, 2007, 03:47:40 PM »
Is this how GW always does their scheduling? Any GW current students out there? I looked at the Spring 2007 schedule and it seems to be the same. I guess it's something you can get used to but I hate that we can't figure out a section from it, or what our overall schedules might be like (excpet for the PT folk).
I found this for this past spring which was kind of what I had wished for in my earlier post:

http://www.law.gwu.edu/NR/rdonlyres/EC6452CC-30C0-4190-AB94-5F3CBCBDD04E/0/CTFSp07.pdf

Not sure if they have one now or will soon for our semester.

dcforlife

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 215
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1645 on: May 22, 2007, 04:16:16 PM »
Apparently PTers are called "Section 21". It may display the solid entrenchment of nerdiness in my personality, but I kind of wish it was Section 31. That would be much, much cooler.

Vick

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1273
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1646 on: May 22, 2007, 04:23:09 PM »
Apparently PTers are called "Section 21". It may display the solid entrenchment of nerdiness in my personality, but I kind of wish it was Section 31. That would be much, much cooler.

Trekkie nerd!

dcforlife

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 215
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1647 on: May 22, 2007, 04:24:07 PM »
Apparently PTers are called "Section 21". It may display the solid entrenchment of nerdiness in my personality, but I kind of wish it was Section 31. That would be much, much cooler.

Trekkie nerd!
Guilty as charged :D

dcforlife

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 215
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1648 on: May 23, 2007, 01:50:25 PM »
thanks dcforlife that is MUCH clearer. It seems like only a couple of classes have different times on different days. I still wonder about the sections though.
Hey dee -- saw this about sections and didn't know if you had: "Students will be given individualized class schedules during IL Orientation indicating the section of the first year courses to which they have been assigned. This information is not available prior to orientation."

myconfessions

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 79
  • ''Denny Crane, legal genius.'' -Denny Crane
    • View Profile
Re: The GW thread
« Reply #1649 on: July 06, 2007, 07:53:42 PM »
Has anyone received a GW need based grant?  I'm just wondering how much aid is required before they offer assistance, and how much is given out.
GW Law Class of 2010