I am considering applying to both, or either, of these schools. I am interested to hear what any of you who have visited, heard about, or studied there have to say about the differences. Tuition is not even close in cost, and if you have info about who gives more money out that would be helpful. USNWR rankings are similar.I am interested in the non-patent IP and commercial law areas of study.
Not to start up the "conservative schools" thread again, but GMU has a conservative rep. It sounds like these are two very different schools.
Quote from: CamelMan on December 30, 2006, 02:54:30 PMNot to start up the "conservative schools" thread again, but GMU has a conservative rep. It sounds like these are two very different schools.*nods*From another thread I was in -- I had asked what made it conservative and here is a response:Quote from: H4CS on December 24, 2006, 02:03:55 AMGMU has a number of strikes against it. One of the worst things it does is that it receives so much money from conservative foundations that it can essentially forcecibly credential undeserving conservatives as it is immune to the pressures of the academic market. (This is also done by conservative book publishers and so on).GMU will hire people with little to no credentials on Olin, Scaife, Coors, whomever money because of their politics and not their background. This person will then use the GMU credential as either a launching post into legitimate academic positions (bypassing those who've had to deal with real competitive pressure) or as a ccredential to get articles and books published.Here's an article from the NRO that brags about how wonderfully conservative it is and how it didn't have to deal with the same pressures that everyone else did (although they did a hilarious job of comparing them to Texas Wesleyan in fighting segregation: http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/miller200603270620.asp)The business about being socially conservative concerns me because, well, I don't like social conservatives. And the economics integrated with all aspects of the program bothers me too because, well, I got a D in econ (and never looked back).AU's cost is troubling, though. It's so close to GW/GULC's tuition (but not rank). And if rank determines jobs, than that's a whole lot of debt to pay off with tricky job prospects.I'm in the same boat. In at AU and I think I'll get in to GMU. I want to go to GW, but if I don't get in, this'll be a struggle for me too.
GMU has a number of strikes against it. One of the worst things it does is that it receives so much money from conservative foundations that it can essentially forcecibly credential undeserving conservatives as it is immune to the pressures of the academic market. (This is also done by conservative book publishers and so on).GMU will hire people with little to no credentials on Olin, Scaife, Coors, whomever money because of their politics and not their background. This person will then use the GMU credential as either a launching post into legitimate academic positions (bypassing those who've had to deal with real competitive pressure) or as a ccredential to get articles and books published.Here's an article from the NRO that brags about how wonderfully conservative it is and how it didn't have to deal with the same pressures that everyone else did (although they did a hilarious job of comparing them to Texas Wesleyan in fighting segregation: http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/miller200603270620.asp)
My friend spent a summer working for GMU Law School. He went in a liberal and came out a libertarian. Luckily, I love libertarians.