good job with the random thread.this should be stickied
Ok, here's my recap of the "What to eat the 2nd and last night before the LSAT"http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,76766.msg1791537.html#msg1791537The OP asks what to eat to assure himself of a 180. For about 2 pages, people give variations of 3 answer types:1. anchovy paste2. just eat well and you'll be fine3. this is flame, right?After that, the thread degenerates into an answer a question with a question thread, mostly perpetuated by Wish, Jer, and yours truly. There are a few random posters who add in their two cents on what to eat, not looking at the recent posts in the thread. These people leave quickly as they are mocked, in question form. Eventually, people try to stop the questions, mainly out of their selfish desires to not have the thread keep popping up in their unreads. Ironically, the posters that request the thread stop are the same ones who randomly GTQ, GAK, and just post to say "hey, me too!" in other threads, with no regard to those threads popping up in other people's unreads. With wish and Jer gone, I retreat until the holiday season ends, giving way to the hypocritical p-dub post-haters.
is this supposed to demonstrate the hypocrisy I described?
Dr. Strad. I think Groundhog's still confused about dirty spooning.And I'm spent.
Quote from: Gengiswump on December 29, 2006, 06:34:41 PM Dr. Strad. I think Groundhog's still confused about dirty spooning.And I'm spent.How did we fail to answer this in the multiple ensuing chatrooms?! Someone tell me!
Jer, did you even self delete? You can't complain if you didn't censor yourself first.
Page created in 0.387 seconds with 19 queries.