Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;
Discussion Discussion
Resources Resources
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Sept '06 LSAT  (Read 2287 times)

«ě»

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4603
  • non sequitur
    • View Profile
Sept '06 LSAT
« on: November 17, 2006, 05:48:14 PM »
Enough self-pity now;)
Logged

gocanes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sept '06 LSAT
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2006, 10:59:13 AM »
omg that is one of the worst lsat stories i've ever heard
Logged
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=umgocanes

game, set, match (attending):
ace (accepted): Cornell, GW ($$), Washington and Lee ($$$$), Wake Forest
duece (w/l): UMichigan
double fault (rejected): Stanford, Columbia, Berkeley
Pending: GULC, UPenn, Chicago, UCLA

jer

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 16596
  • i likes gold chapstick
    • View Profile
Re: Sept '06 LSAT
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2006, 11:02:28 AM »
makes me more thankful for my uneventful sept lsat

/came a foot from backing over a neighborhood dog on my way to the lsat
Logged

gocanes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sept '06 LSAT
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2006, 11:14:38 AM »
my worst thing was spilling orange juice over my admissions ticket and not being able to print another one out at 8 in the morning because i don't have a printer at my apartment and my undergrad library is opens at like 9 on weekends

(yes, the proctor laughed at me)
Logged
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=umgocanes

game, set, match (attending):
ace (accepted): Cornell, GW ($$), Washington and Lee ($$$$), Wake Forest
duece (w/l): UMichigan
double fault (rejected): Stanford, Columbia, Berkeley
Pending: GULC, UPenn, Chicago, UCLA

«ě»

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4603
  • non sequitur
    • View Profile
Re: Sept '06 LSAT
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2006, 11:17:24 AM »
Quote from: gocanes on December 02, 2006, 10:59:13 AM
omg that is one of the worst lsat stories i've ever heard

Hehe, lets hope the adcomms agree, as I obviously wrote a LSAT addendum ;)

Ah well, truth is it probably didn't cost me all that many points, but if it gives me some extra sympathy from the adcomms, I dont mind.
Logged

younghova

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 371
    • View Profile
Re: Sept '06 LSAT
« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2006, 03:43:38 AM »
i kind of feel bad for you.

but on the other hand, you resided in a cool part of the world.

taking the lsat in London sounds kind of romantic (especially taking a flight to it).

Logged

«ě»

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4603
  • non sequitur
    • View Profile
Re: Sept '06 LSAT
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2006, 06:37:49 AM »
Yeah, kinda annoying part that as well, but hardly worth writing an addendum about the coat check dude ;)

Were you also in the room where the old fool triggered the burglary alarm, or were you sitting somewhere else?
Logged
Pages: [1]