Because some profs reserve the right to subjectively raise or lower your final exam grade by a letter. Let's say you earned a B on the final, but slacked off every day in class. He can easily give you a C. And it doesn't matter if you scream "Unfair".And that doesn't even touch on if it's a subjective essay exam where he can be even rougher on grading. After all, by not speaking up in class, you had no idea (in his opinion) of the proper way to phrase an answer.
Quote from: Steve.jd on November 13, 2006, 10:29:24 PMUhh this is wrong on so many levels. 50 pages a night is excessive and rare...30-35 on average is much more accurate. Grading is completely blind and all exams are typed - 100% of your grade is based on the final so the prof cannot change your grade at all based on participation - although he/she might base recommendations on participation. Everyone in the room is cheering for you. No one is hoping you fail, the vast majority of your peers end up with virtually the same grades, and everyone gets a good job. Learning is completely cooperative and any pressure is self-enforced.Oh, it must be nice to go to Harvard.We get about 20 pages per night per class, on average (which would make the average 50/night). 4 real classes, each three times per week... my schedule has us with 4 classes per day on Wednesday and Thursday (one of those is legal writing, granted, but considering some of the LRW assignments, that can actually be wildly worse). It's a long week.And all professors can change your grade plus or minus one step based on attendance/preparedness/participation, and we do get cold-called. Not everyone gets good jobs. And when you people get called on, no one's cheering for or against them--they're just thinking "I'm glad it's not me" and trying to follow along and understand what the professor is asking. And I don't see how learning would be cooperative, at least here, although FWIW I consider all learning to be a solo endeavor... but still I think most people just do their own thing, trying to keep up day by day.And the interrogations have gotten a lot harder. You need to know the facts and procedural history and holding and the court's reasoning still (although it often won't be asked for), but now we're expected to to be able to compare cases, or work the rule we just did into a case from early in the semester, or otherwise answer hypos with shifting fact patterns.
Uhh this is wrong on so many levels. 50 pages a night is excessive and rare...30-35 on average is much more accurate. Grading is completely blind and all exams are typed - 100% of your grade is based on the final so the prof cannot change your grade at all based on participation - although he/she might base recommendations on participation. Everyone in the room is cheering for you. No one is hoping you fail, the vast majority of your peers end up with virtually the same grades, and everyone gets a good job. Learning is completely cooperative and any pressure is self-enforced.
To be fair,1. LRW is not really P/F. It's H, P, LP, F.2. Cold-calling happens all the time at HLS, just not in section 2 (or 5?) much.3. HLS has it easy in terms of number of substantive classes.4. Reading must vary by professor. For example, my Civ Pro prof, were she able to get through what she assigns, would put us through like 60 pages per day. Luckily, we cover roughly 2.5 pages/day. Ah, civ pro.5. Some prof's want law school to be hard, even if it isn't. This is why my crim law prof asks impossible questions every class. That said, law school isn't hard. It's more like elementary school (in many ways) than rocket science.EDIT: This doesn't mean I claim to know anything about the law or expect to do well.
At this point classes also start to get very confusing because you begin to learn about the more complicated areas in the law like the Erie Doctrine....
Quote from: Tyrael on November 14, 2006, 01:30:18 AMAt this point classes also start to get very confusing because you begin to learn about the more complicated areas in the law like the Erie Doctrine.... Oddly, I don't think we'll be getting to that. Isn't that sacrilege?
Quote from: bass on November 14, 2006, 01:31:59 AMQuote from: Tyrael on November 14, 2006, 01:30:18 AMAt this point classes also start to get very confusing because you begin to learn about the more complicated areas in the law like the Erie Doctrine.... Oddly, I don't think we'll be getting to that. Isn't that sacrilege?Oh hrm, you guys are going really slow then I guess.Erie is awesome.Read Erie, Hannah v. Plumber, Byrd, and Guaranty Trust Co for the major case overview