Law School Discussion

Proposal 2 and UofMich

butter tart

  • ****
  • 128
  • Mmmmmmm!
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal 2 and UofMich
« Reply #330 on: December 14, 2006, 12:44:21 PM »
The following is a Detroit Free Press article from today (12/14/06) detailing what the Michigan AG intends to do about the new anti-AA amendment in Michigan.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061214/NEWS99/61214024


t L

  • ****
  • 2087
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal 2 and UofMich
« Reply #331 on: December 20, 2006, 04:44:23 AM »
For anybody that cares or that it matters to, the motion that the Michigan universities filed was granted.  So they can practice AA for the rest of the admissions cycle.

parsley

Re: Proposal 2 and UofMich
« Reply #332 on: December 20, 2006, 07:44:55 AM »
Was it really that "their motion was granted"?

Or was it that they just sat down and hammered out a deal that confirms the constitutionality of Proposal 2 while protecting the integrity of this cycle? 

Miss P

  • *****
  • 19300
    • View Profile
Re: Proposal 2 and UofMich
« Reply #333 on: December 20, 2006, 10:14:37 AM »
Was it really that "their motion was granted"?

Or was it that they just sat down and hammered out a deal that confirms the constitutionality of Proposal 2 while protecting the integrity of this cycle? 

Are you Eric Russell, Parsley? :D