If there aren't any arguments against my claims, then I'll depart gracefully. Feel free to continue the concordant attack on my character, it's funny.
Hugs, Look to the f-ing left.
Well you either do or you don't...you can't conditionally agree with it...if one factor is to weighed less, it means another has to weighed more...and *someone* will benefit from that reorganization...you either trust that adcoms know what they're doing or you call for a complete overhaul..anything less is approaching hypocrisy...
but I do not think that race should be one of those values.
All I have been trying to say is that I believe there can be diversity without race as a determining factor.
It seems to me that in order to be aganist race-based AA, you would have to deny either the assumption or some other step in this reasoning, while preserving the integrity of your stance on socio-economic AA.
or you can disagree with the inherently questionable proposition that the solution to racism is more racism.