Argh, I really should proofread when I'm going back and forth between two things...
The Islamic diaspora in Europe is completely different than the diaspora in the United States. The Islamic community in the US is highly integrated comparatively -- they speak English, participate in the economic and social life of the country, etc. But in Europe, the consolidation of the Islamic community is leading to separate Islamic communities that do not watch Arabic television shows, get all of their news from Arabic broadcasts, do not speak the language of the countries they live in, and withdraw from economic and social life outside of the Islamic communities. There is, believe it or not, persecution from both sides. In some areas, women are not allowed to wear the hijab; in others, students are assaulted for attending school during Ramadan. They have a huge problem on the horizon...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Francehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Londonistan_%28term%29http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,1593282,00.html
There's a pretty big difference between a policy and a general call for balance between integration and what are becoming nearly autonomous communities within a country. Integration doesn't have to necessarily be conforming, but could be accomplished with dialogue, compromise and education could be helpful. The OP took offense to the general call for balance between integration and multiculturalism, and said nothing about head scarves.
Immigrants who decide to move to a foreign country should understand that it is not the country that has the responsibility to alter itself for those who want to come, but rather the immigrants should be accepting of that country's laws and traditions. I did not live in Italy and expect that Italy start to celebrate the Fourth of July and Thanksgiving. If I moved to a country in the Middle East, it would be my responsibility to accept its culture; not obligatory for that country to alter itself to support my way of life.
Quote from: President_Baccaga on October 18, 2006, 11:41:56 AMImmigrants who decide to move to a foreign country should understand that it is not the country that has the responsibility to alter itself for those who want to come, but rather the immigrants should be accepting of that country's laws and traditions. I did not live in Italy and expect that Italy start to celebrate the Fourth of July and Thanksgiving. If I moved to a country in the Middle East, it would be my responsibility to accept its culture; not obligatory for that country to alter itself to support my way of life.This para is weak.
What does the bolded part mean? Could California hippies, for example, or New York Hasidim, be considered semi-autonomous communities?
Eh, y'all are close to making me enter this thread for real.hopes-n-dreams -- you're right about everything you've said so far. This sort of topic just attracts the C-Span call-in types, that's all.