yea umm i'm going to say -10 with a distinct possibility of -11. for those of you who think games are the deciding factor, my teacher told me that the lsat is DELIBERATELY shifting in importance from games to RC. i think we actually were the first test where it was so lopsided. though i sorta ran out of time on the games, i didnt think they were *hard*, though maybe slightly more than recently. however, RC was a beast. and i even finished on time. im judging this solely by the amount of contention that has occured over at least 5 questions-- where the passage seemed to be interpreted completely differently. not only was the section longer, but the material was way more dense than usual-- especially the science passage. i really wouldn't be surprised, esp if people screw up so badly on reading comp, that the scale is -11. the test may be standardized for certain questions... but lsac has never administered this test with these questions and this amount of time crunch. i'm hoping they will adjust accordingly.
i also dispute that these LR sections were easy. they were definitely harder than the stuff i had been taking. i got 0-1 wrong on most of the practice tests i was taking *combined). i think i may have missed 3 or 4 this time around. the amount of debate on this board is a good indicator that questions were harder than they might have at first seemed.