QuoteI'm also (more) interested in your thoughts about the obligation of the unoccupied nation's to use force responsibly. Force used responsibly? The terrorists should pay for what they have done. Force is not an issue. If you have murdered a person in the US; and when the police break down your door, throw you on the ground, punch you in the back of the neck (for not cooperating), then toss you into jail...is that a misuse of force? Should no force be used? How responsible should the officers be? If the suspect is a murderer, they should be shot on site. That is it.
I'm also (more) interested in your thoughts about the obligation of the unoccupied nation's to use force responsibly.
That's cool how you referenced a case.
I'm so far from the end of my tether right now that I reckon I could knit myself some socks with the slack.
Quote from: dsnutter on July 30, 2006, 04:18:30 PMQuoteI'm also (more) interested in your thoughts about the obligation of the unoccupied nation's to use force responsibly. Force used responsibly? The terrorists should pay for what they have done. Force is not an issue. If you have murdered a person in the US; and when the police break down your door, throw you on the ground, punch you in the back of the neck (for not cooperating), then toss you into jail...is that a misuse of force? Should no force be used? How responsible should the officers be? If the suspect is a murderer, they should be shot on site. That is it.This is not exactly the American way, kid. Read your Constitution lately? I'm assuming you think of yourself as a patriot. In any case, I wasn't even talking about using force responsibly against the "murderer" in your example or against terrorists. I was talking about using force responsibly against civilians. If you have no interest in this, I question your morality.
The world was once based on morals. However, today, it seems as though they have been thrown out the window. And I will attribute this to a group of blood-thirsty people who would like nothing more than to kill every white man on this planet. Given the chance, I would like to physically show them what hate they have fueled in me. Seriously, F them. They are irrational, irresponsible, and deserve to die a most painful death for their sins.
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,68214.0.html
Quote from: Miss P on July 30, 2006, 06:05:31 PMQuote from: trollik on July 30, 2006, 05:58:26 PMhttp://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,68214.0.htmlWhy'd you quote my post? I don't get it. Anyway, yeah, I saw that, but didn't we already discuss that column to death in the main thread?arguing is pointless. anything Israel does to attempt to take out Hezbollah is justified. that's my POV. so as long as they don't bomb clearly Christian neighborhoods of Beirut, for example, I think they have a full right to bombard.
Quote from: trollik on July 30, 2006, 05:58:26 PMhttp://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,68214.0.htmlWhy'd you quote my post? I don't get it. Anyway, yeah, I saw that, but didn't we already discuss that column to death in the main thread?
that makes it ok. but I'd say you gotta be a lot more careful there than in south lebanon where the population actively supports their role as human shields for hezbollah.
Quote from: Miss P on July 30, 2006, 06:49:23 PMQuote from: trollik on July 30, 2006, 06:46:20 PMthat makes it ok. but I'd say you gotta be a lot more careful there than in south lebanon where the population actively supports their role as human shields for hezbollah.Trollik, either they're being exploited as human shields or they are active Hezbollah supporters. Human shields are not Hezbollah supporters by virtue of their exploitation.not necessarily. a human shield can revel in this position, as many hezbollah supporters do. if they die, they become martyrs, don't you see?
Quote from: trollik on July 30, 2006, 06:46:20 PMthat makes it ok. but I'd say you gotta be a lot more careful there than in south lebanon where the population actively supports their role as human shields for hezbollah.Trollik, either they're being exploited as human shields or they are active Hezbollah supporters. Human shields are not Hezbollah supporters by virtue of their exploitation.
if hezbollah hit an Israeli home killing civilians, I wonder if they'd halt their operations or apologize.double standard.
how long do they get that pass for? And besides, it's Iran with the blood on their hands. So Iran is allowed to kill civilians at will but Israel isn't?