yes, my moral lines are inflexible. there is no circumstance in which imprisoning an innocent man is morally justifiable. flexible morals are amoral.
This really isn't the place for this, but I can't resist. Do you really think that all flexible morals are amoral? I mean, really?
So, for instance, if, somehow, for some reason, you were put in a situation where you either had to release 10 of the 9/11 bombers (or, perhaps, 10 of these potential bombers they arrested today in London) or put an innocent man in jail for one night, you would choose the former, because the latter would be immoral?
Or have you ever stolen a grape? Or told a harmless or mostly harmless lie? In which case are you immoral or, as you seem to think, amoral? If so, do your insults "immoral" and "amoral" even have any meaning anymore? Or do they become vapid modifiers, like most swear words these days.