Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Hitler v. Coulter  (Read 347 times)

WarrenG

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
  • Me
    • MSN Messenger - WarrenG24@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
"That which we believe to be real becomes real in it's consequences."

Happy_Weasel

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Me and Gir, the happy weasel.
    • MSN Messenger - ominusdemon2@msn.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Hitler v. Coulter
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2006, 12:48:13 AM »
I only got 5 right.  :D EMPYRE RULES!!!!

bruin

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 13867
    • View Profile
    • lsn profile
Re: Hitler v. Coulter
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2006, 12:49:27 AM »
I missed 1. :(
Attending UVa
Click below for more info
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?cycle=0405&user=bruin04
Come on, I know you want to click me.

Happy_Weasel

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Me and Gir, the happy weasel.
    • MSN Messenger - ominusdemon2@msn.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Hitler v. Coulter
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2006, 12:53:06 AM »
Yeah, I sort of stretched Coulter out there, the Bush test was better.

Happy_Weasel

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Me and Gir, the happy weasel.
    • MSN Messenger - ominusdemon2@msn.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Hitler v. Coulter
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2006, 02:47:50 AM »
how about the f-ing fact that liberal in the 1930s, as used by Hitler, was the French definition of today, not the one that includes Cynthia McKinney and Michael Moore, but one much closer to John McCain.  you are f-ing scum.  true scum.

oh yeah, i find it amusing and ironic that you have as your tar an assault rifle used by the commies.  :D

My tool, on the other hand, is less seditous.   :)

bruin

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 13867
    • View Profile
    • lsn profile
Re: Hitler v. Coulter
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2006, 02:49:34 AM »
how about the f-ing fact that liberal in the 1930s, as used by Hitler, was the French definition of today, not the one that includes Cynthia McKinney and Michael Moore, but one much closer to John McCain.  you are f-ing scum.  true scum.

oh yeah, i find it amusing and ironic that you have as your tar an assault rifle used by the commies.  :D

My tool, on the other hand, is less seditous.   :)

Exactly: S&W is all good; the least that trollik could do is use an M4 as his tar.
Attending UVa
Click below for more info
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?cycle=0405&user=bruin04
Come on, I know you want to click me.

Happy_Weasel

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Me and Gir, the happy weasel.
    • MSN Messenger - ominusdemon2@msn.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Hitler v. Coulter
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2006, 02:51:20 AM »
how about the f-ing fact that liberal in the 1930s, as used by Hitler, was the French definition of today, not the one that includes Cynthia McKinney and Michael Moore, but one much closer to John McCain.  you are f-ing scum.  true scum.

oh yeah, i find it amusing and ironic that you have as your tar an assault rifle used by the commies.  :D

Exactly, it's time to change that:



Now that's a patriot's rifle. My step dad has one, by the way. I used to play "Hit the trash can lid" with it on the BLM.

Happy_Weasel

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Me and Gir, the happy weasel.
    • MSN Messenger - ominusdemon2@msn.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Hitler v. Coulter
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2006, 01:08:35 PM »
...yeah, but it is also now used by TERRORISTS!!!