Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2  (Read 1104 times)

Harper

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
  • works every time
    • AOL Instant Messenger - harperfan02138
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - harperfan02138
    • View Profile
    • Email
THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« on: June 12, 2006, 11:06:29 PM »
So please stop asking about it in the threads.      :)

If you don't believe me, please check out the many threads already available which address the issue.  And if you still don't believe me, I suppose you can chat about it here, if you'd like. 

paigeroo

  • Guest
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2006, 11:07:12 PM »
haha this SO needed to be announced, thanks Harper  ;)

bosco17

  • Guest
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2006, 11:21:55 PM »
you made a typo... the experimental was section #4. not 2.







 ;D

LSATisKillingMe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
  • I want my score
    • View Profile
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2006, 11:26:39 PM »
Don't kill my dreams... what do you mean #2??? it was #1 lol...

LizPendens™

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5381
  • The Real Alice -- Adventures in Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2006, 11:36:10 PM »
The experimental was section 6. Haven't you figured that out yet?
There foam'd rebellious Logic, gagg'd and bound.                           
            -  Charles Dodgson,  "Lewis Carroll"                               
                         "The Game of Logic"

Preppy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2006, 12:09:55 AM »
Don't kill my dreams... what do you mean #2??? it was #1 lol...

...and I bet you had the impossible LR as your first section right?


I know I did. Hearing Section #2 is experimental is really a downer :-[
In: Univ. of Denver; Widener Univ.; Valpo Univ.
WL: Univ. of Akron; Univ. of Baltimore; Hofstra Univ.
Out: None.....yet

Da5id

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 221
    • View Profile
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2006, 12:56:37 AM »
Wow, I'm not sure whether to be happy or sad.

I was convinced that #3 was the experimental. I had LG for both #2 and #3. The #3 was so easy it wasn't even funny (hi astronauts), the #2 was rough but I got through it.

If #3 was legit that bodes badly for the curve. The LG were MAD easy.

coffeeismylifesource

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 55
    • View Profile
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2006, 01:26:12 AM »
...I just want to say I feel bad for ya'll who took the test today. Not only did most of you on here probably follow the advice and not expect an experimental before the break, but apparently the experimental was killer.

I just want to see deloggio and the like choke on their foot after saying there would NEVER be an experimental before the break.

Are you confused or just being sarcastic?

LizPendens™

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5381
  • The Real Alice -- Adventures in Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2006, 01:26:36 AM »
Uh, the experimental is commonly known to (almost) always be before the break.

Deloggio's advice is, however, not known for its accuracy.
There foam'd rebellious Logic, gagg'd and bound.                           
            -  Charles Dodgson,  "Lewis Carroll"                               
                         "The Game of Logic"

TinaTina

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
    • MSN Messenger - FlorentinaLSD@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: THE EXPERIMENTAL WAS SECTION #2
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2006, 01:29:14 AM »
Cut her a break. She's already accepted to law school, she's not obsessively reading the threads like everyone else.  Reading only a post or two before the general consensus formed in the post-mortem threads could confuse anyone.