Here's a fresh thought:
you're a white guy with good numbers, going to a top five law school. Would it really hurt you, at this very late stage in the game, to step back and cut others some slack? So WHAT if a URM beat you out at Harvard. You, pal, are sitting in the top fraction of a percentile in this country, and doing even better worldwide.
What exactly are you fighting against? It doesn't get much better than how you have it.
Look, as I said, this debate has nothing to do with me. I don't feel as though I was entitled to get into any school that I didn't (with the exception of Penn). My numbers weren't good enough for them. However, I don't see why I should cut people slack who didn't work for what they ended up getting.

Didn't work for? So you think that URMs stroll into HLS off of a street corner somewhere? They didn't work for it? If it were that easy, every URM who graduates from college would be at Harvard, Yale, or Stanford Law.
Look, I think your arguments are much better served by saying - I don't think diversity should be a concern in admissions decisions. There will be people who are argue you on that, but I think that's a much more defendable position than the ones you tend to take (like URMs don't work hard and aren't qualified)