So it turns out that logic is a Cambodian named Sovann. Who knew? If I ever sober up, I may respond to some points, or think about them, or well, this is all moot, no?
Eh, think about them - maybe. Respond? That just feeds the morons.
I keep telling you: it's Ms. not miss
in this case I was attacked for not being able to recognize a logical argument. the best response to that is showing an objective example that I am, in fact, able to reason logically. since I have not taken an IQ test recently, I point to the lsat.
actually, no, it would help if anyone here thought that the lsat is a good predictor of logical reasoning ability. are you claiming otherwise?
I think that you've got your YCs confused
Quote from: red. on May 14, 2006, 08:21:03 PMI think that you've got your YCs confused God, is everyone in here asking for it, or is it me.
there is nothing about being impressed by a score that implies you must think that the score has certain other interpretations. I'm not impressed by anybody's lsat. but it is an OBJECTIVE measure of logical reasoning.what logic do I need to display? I asked how the "history of victimhood" reasoning for AA would account to the boost that would be given to a 2nd generation African-American whose parents emigrated from Nigeria more than a 2nd generation Vietnamese-American. I recieved an ad-hom response.