the school might not catch it. there are some african americans or biracial individuals that could 'pass' as white. the problem comes if & when c&f denies you for the bar. this could lead to the school revoking your jd. then you would have waisted 3/4 years and still owe over 100k.
Words of advice: Don't try to lie. One poster was caught.Don't reveal so much info on lsn on your real name.You do kind of look black in the small facebook image.Better not post this on xo.
wow--i know i'm late, but big tex is [removed]? that whole email stuff was shocking...
Quote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 04:03:19 AMI'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.Yes, but I would argue that withdrawing an acceptance after admission for something that arbtritrary would be tortious.
I'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.
Say 90% white, 10% black, does not look black at all. Can they apply as mixed, both white and black?What would be the consquences if the law school admitted someone due to AA cuz of what race they said, but the law school disagreed. ie a white student claming black when he does not know any black in his family tree and of what he knows consits only of white?Has a law school ever done anything to an applicant that lied and got it?
Quote from: philibusters on May 08, 2006, 11:35:03 AMQuote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:14:34 AMQuote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 04:03:19 AMI'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.Yes, but I would argue that withdrawing an acceptance after admission for something that arbtritrary would be tortious. Maybe, though I might look to contract theory first. My guess is that they a reserved right to withdraw the acceptance, but chose not to use it. Once you are in the school, schools don't like to kick you out.Yes, but from my (limited) understanding of American legal jurisprudence, the right to withdraw the acceptance is not unlimited.
Quote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:14:34 AMQuote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 04:03:19 AMI'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.Yes, but I would argue that withdrawing an acceptance after admission for something that arbtritrary would be tortious. Maybe, though I might look to contract theory first. My guess is that they a reserved right to withdraw the acceptance, but chose not to use it. Once you are in the school, schools don't like to kick you out.
Quote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 05:29:00 PMQuote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:36:55 AMQuote from: philibusters on May 08, 2006, 11:35:03 AMQuote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:14:34 AMQuote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 04:03:19 AMI'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.Yes, but I would argue that withdrawing an acceptance after admission for something that arbtritrary would be tortious. What we are all not acknowledging is that a lot of it would depend on if the person signed something giving the school the right to terminate or if they reserved that right in some other way or something like that. In other words, we are guessing a bit in the absence of any paperwork.Maybe, though I might look to contract theory first. My guess is that they a reserved right to withdraw the acceptance, but chose not to use it. Once you are in the school, schools don't like to kick you out.Yes, but from my (limited) understanding of American legal jurisprudence, the right to withdraw the acceptance is not unlimited. It is probably similar to an at-will employment contract. An employer can offer you a job, you can accept, and then the employer can turn around a week later and fire you. No reason necessary. I'd be surprised if law schools haven't thought this stuff through.That's a bit different than an offer of acceptance, I'd say. And even at-will employment situations have many many limitations.
Quote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:36:55 AMQuote from: philibusters on May 08, 2006, 11:35:03 AMQuote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:14:34 AMQuote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 04:03:19 AMI'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.Yes, but I would argue that withdrawing an acceptance after admission for something that arbtritrary would be tortious. What we are all not acknowledging is that a lot of it would depend on if the person signed something giving the school the right to terminate or if they reserved that right in some other way or something like that. In other words, we are guessing a bit in the absence of any paperwork.Maybe, though I might look to contract theory first. My guess is that they a reserved right to withdraw the acceptance, but chose not to use it. Once you are in the school, schools don't like to kick you out.Yes, but from my (limited) understanding of American legal jurisprudence, the right to withdraw the acceptance is not unlimited. It is probably similar to an at-will employment contract. An employer can offer you a job, you can accept, and then the employer can turn around a week later and fire you. No reason necessary. I'd be surprised if law schools haven't thought this stuff through.
Quote from: philibusters on May 08, 2006, 11:35:03 AMQuote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:14:34 AMQuote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 04:03:19 AMI'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.Yes, but I would argue that withdrawing an acceptance after admission for something that arbtritrary would be tortious. What we are all not acknowledging is that a lot of it would depend on if the person signed something giving the school the right to terminate or if they reserved that right in some other way or something like that. In other words, we are guessing a bit in the absence of any paperwork.Maybe, though I might look to contract theory first. My guess is that they a reserved right to withdraw the acceptance, but chose not to use it. Once you are in the school, schools don't like to kick you out.Yes, but from my (limited) understanding of American legal jurisprudence, the right to withdraw the acceptance is not unlimited.
Quote from: Googler on May 08, 2006, 11:14:34 AMQuote from: dbgirl on May 08, 2006, 04:03:19 AMI'm pretty sure a private school can use whatever standard it chooses to select applicants.Yes, but I would argue that withdrawing an acceptance after admission for something that arbtritrary would be tortious. What we are all not acknowledging is that a lot of it would depend on if the person signed something giving the school the right to terminate or if they reserved that right in some other way or something like that. In other words, we are guessing a bit in the absence of any paperwork.Maybe, though I might look to contract theory first. My guess is that they a reserved right to withdraw the acceptance, but chose not to use it. Once you are in the school, schools don't like to kick you out.