i'm afraid i can't pay attention to someone with such an insignificant post count. i know you care julie. remember all those one-word posts you had after i first passed you? no seriously though, i prefer stuff that's meatier. like abramoff, has he gotten anyone in jail yet?
Quote from: SW on March 31, 2006, 08:06:00 AMi'm afraid i can't pay attention to someone with such an insignificant post count. i know you care julie. remember all those one-word posts you had after i first passed you? no seriously though, i prefer stuff that's meatier. like abramoff, has he gotten anyone in jail yet?if julie wanted higher post count than you, she'd have it, junior.
Althought I don't agree with much of Scalia's jurisprudence, I think this story demonstrates the judicial independence that makes our country great. He shouldn't have any further comment - he said it all, and it took cojones. I don't think it's arrogance - he's actually much more intelligent than most of his critics, so he has every right to disregard their opinions. Despite the fact that his intellect leads him to different conclusions than you or I might draw, he almost always makes us think. And Red, if you have supreme ambitions (I've no reason to think you're unqualified), I suggest that you STOP POSTING IMMEDIATELY!!! Considering what they're dredging up on the latest nominees, I shudder to think what they'll do to prospective SCOTUS judges a generation from now . . .