so much work to fake it though. it really is kinda lame, and sad.
I bet that took about 15 minutes to fake...All they had to do was enter the data into a spreadsheet, which could have been copied and pasted from a number of sources, then just print it out and take a picture...
Quote from: TheJesus on March 28, 2006, 01:21:36 PMI bet that took about 15 minutes to fake...All they had to do was enter the data into a spreadsheet, which could have been copied and pasted from a number of sources, then just print it out and take a picture...TITCR
this is the credited response.i was saying you were correct. don't get your panties in a bunch.and to be fair, the inclusion of the PT numbers wouldn't necessarily prove it a fake. USNWR could simply decide that they were going to start doing it. Would you call them up and complain that their print magazine is a flame?Anyway, I already admitted it was a flame. In the future I will not acknowledge you if you're right about something. It apparently causes you great anger and frustration.
Quote from: usnews2007 on March 28, 2006, 01:45:27 PMthis is the credited response.i was saying you were correct. don't get your panties in a bunch.and to be fair, the inclusion of the PT numbers wouldn't necessarily prove it a fake. USNWR could simply decide that they were going to start doing it. Would you call them up and complain that their print magazine is a flame?Anyway, I already admitted it was a flame. In the future I will not acknowledge you if you're right about something. It apparently causes you great anger and frustration.lol, what a loser...I'll bet he's making another fake as we speak, minus the obvious f*ck-ups that were included in this one...The Rankings are coming out online first this year, on Friday March 31st...the print edition won't be on the shelves until the following Monday April 3rd, so anything between now and then is fake no matter how real it looks
Discussion
Resources
