Jesus, that isn't true. Schools get them tomorrow and in every year past they have been leaked. There is no reason why that won't likely happen again.
Quote from: TheJesus on March 28, 2006, 01:51:47 PMQuote from: usnews2007 on March 28, 2006, 01:45:27 PMthis is the credited response.i was saying you were correct. don't get your panties in a bunch.and to be fair, the inclusion of the PT numbers wouldn't necessarily prove it a fake. USNWR could simply decide that they were going to start doing it. Would you call them up and complain that their print magazine is a flame?Anyway, I already admitted it was a flame. In the future I will not acknowledge you if you're right about something. It apparently causes you great anger and frustration.lol, what a loser...I'll bet he's making another fake as we speak, minus the obvious f*ck-ups that were included in this one...The Rankings are coming out online first this year, on Friday March 31st...the print edition won't be on the shelves until the following Monday April 3rd, so anything between now and then is fake no matter how real it looksbuddy, take your bitter TTT triple major from a TTT school in michigan, factor in your TTT gpa and TTT lsat, and go bother someone else. you're much more involved in getting upset about the fake than i am it was outted. do you think for a minute i expected to pass it off? hell even if i had i would've been saying "haha gotcha guys. it was fake" today. sh*t calm down.and to top it all off you're a democrat. thank god i'll never ever in my life encounter thejesus. we're going to be playing in two distant parks.
Quote from: usnews2007 on March 28, 2006, 01:45:27 PMthis is the credited response.i was saying you were correct. don't get your panties in a bunch.and to be fair, the inclusion of the PT numbers wouldn't necessarily prove it a fake. USNWR could simply decide that they were going to start doing it. Would you call them up and complain that their print magazine is a flame?Anyway, I already admitted it was a flame. In the future I will not acknowledge you if you're right about something. It apparently causes you great anger and frustration.lol, what a loser...I'll bet he's making another fake as we speak, minus the obvious f*ck-ups that were included in this one...The Rankings are coming out online first this year, on Friday March 31st...the print edition won't be on the shelves until the following Monday April 3rd, so anything between now and then is fake no matter how real it looks
this is the credited response.i was saying you were correct. don't get your panties in a bunch.and to be fair, the inclusion of the PT numbers wouldn't necessarily prove it a fake. USNWR could simply decide that they were going to start doing it. Would you call them up and complain that their print magazine is a flame?Anyway, I already admitted it was a flame. In the future I will not acknowledge you if you're right about something. It apparently causes you great anger and frustration.
TITCR = This Is The Credited Response. You're upset and name-calling because he agreed with you?
it looks like you accidentally removed a link to your LSN profile. in case you forgot what it is, i saved it for you: http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=thejesus
Quote from: usnews2007 on March 28, 2006, 01:28:32 AMHere they are in all their glory. Don't complain to me if you don't like them.http://img365.imageshack.us/img365/875/2007b1kd.gifI think this is doctored.
Here they are in all their glory. Don't complain to me if you don't like them.http://img365.imageshack.us/img365/875/2007b1kd.gif
Discussion
Resources
